Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1837 <br />April 22, 2002 <br /> <br />a fiberoptic feed into 500 node pockets. Reliability and outages will be reduced <br />significantly. 43 nodes will be placed into the University City area. They promise to <br />door tag each customer at least 48 hours before they have to bury any cable. <br /> <br />Responding to Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Gentry said that basically they would be making <br />upgrades to be able to utilize high speed access without phone lines for the internet. <br />The fiberoptic cable will come up to a node and then be distributed to homes connected <br />to the node. Mr. Lieberman asked what this was going to cost the citizens. Mr. <br />Bordeaux stated that by Federal law, they can not pass the cost of the upgrade along to <br />the subscribers, so it is an investment on the part of Charter, so they can offer more <br />services and updated quality of services that are currently being offered. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe was interested in finding out what the timeline was for this project. Mr. <br />Gentry said that he would like to get started in University City by May and have it <br />completed by the end of this August. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner stated that the City has seen some fee increases from Charter already. He <br />asked if we were to expect more fee increases and if yes, when we would be expecting <br />them. Mr. Bordeaux said that the recent rate increases were related to additional <br />channels being added to the existing line up. Charter pays a license fee to the networks <br />to get access to those channels to show to the subscribers. When the networks raise <br />their fees, then Charter is allowed by federal law to pass those fees onto the subscriber. <br />These types of increases always have a strong possibility of occurring, but in reference <br />to the plant upgrades that have been spoken about this evening, that fee will not be <br />passed on to the subscribers. Mr. Wagner said that this is fine, but his constituents <br />complain that they are being made to pay the upgrades for new channels that they do <br />not want. He asked if the payments to the network providers could be segmented in a <br />way that would allow some subscribers not to have to pay for the channels that they did <br />not want. Mr. Bordeaux said that constituents have a choice of a basic, expanded basic <br />and a digital service and within the digital service, there are different packages available <br />for the subscriber to choose from with a variety of prices. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Sharpe, Mr. Bordeaux said that what had happened with the new <br />boxes was that Charter changed from an analog platform from a digital platform. <br />Subscribers already receiving premium analog services had to receive a digital box in <br />order to continue receiving premium services, albeit on a digital system. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman stated that much of the resident's objections were because Charter <br />required that they rent the digital box and pay more for the very same services they <br />were getting a month prior. Mr. Bordeaux said that he understands the frustration, yet <br />the migration was necessary in order get the necessary room to add the extra services. <br /> <br />Cathey Allen, 14979 Green Circle, said that she has worked for the City for nineteen <br />years as a police officer and is a sergeant working the street. She is representing the <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />