My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-10-31 Retreat
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-10-31 Retreat
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 4:16:10 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 3:45:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
10/31/2006
SESSIONNUM
2018
TYPE
SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5. Risks <br /> To be proactive, it will require taking risks. <br /> Ms. Ricci said she wanted to discuss the process of how Council makes their decisions and <br /> is it the most efficient way. <br /> Mr. Marmillion said the process sets free good creative thinking and this is very important. <br />6. Turf <br /> Mr. Wagner said this is true in regards to protecting issues of a ward. <br /> Mr. Price felt turf was good because you defer to your constituents. <br /> Mayor Adams said he represenedt the whole community and the general welfare of the <br /> entire community. <br /> Mr. Price said he felt the undercurrent of residents living behind the Olive Street <br /> businesses. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marmillion helped Council develop a criteria list in which all issues should be able <br /> to reside. It is important not to react to environment instead of creating own. <br />? <br /> Economic Development <br />? <br /> Quality of Life <br />? <br /> Public Infrastructure <br />? <br /> Quality Maintenance <br />7. Not In My Back Yard <br /> Mr. Price said he defers to whoever’s backyard it is in. <br /> Mr. Wagner said that rather than being issue driven; it would be better to have an <br /> over-all vision of where we want to be. <br /> <br />Mr. Marmillion said you need to step back and see where it fits into context of priority. <br /> <br />Mr. Marmillion then had Council list the (+) and (-) under Progress and Cooperation <br /> <br />Pluses <br />? <br /> New City Manager <br />? <br /> Passage of Prop U <br />? <br /> Fill vacant Council seat <br />Minuses <br />? <br /> Into weeds on issues <br />? <br /> Reactive, not proactive <br />? <br /> Inconsistancy <br />? <br /> Internal infrastructural <br />? <br /> Dwindling revenues <br />? <br /> External influences <br />? <br /> Lack of economic development incentives <br />? <br /> Aging housing stock <br />? <br /> gentrification – multi-family units <br /> <br />Council next worked on creating a list of items that cause tension <br />? <br /> Process for setting agendas <br />? <br /> Establishing priority areas <br />? <br /> Better us of liaison positions with boards and commissions <br />? <br /> More time needed on pre-study; not time given for pre-discussion <br />? <br /> Need for credible background information; relevant pros and cons, information/data <br />? <br /> Council needs understanding before it even goes to the commission <br />? <br /> Efficient information <br />? <br /> Budget information <br />? <br /> Community attitudes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.