Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1859 <br />November 4, 2002 <br /> <br />which carried unanimously. <br /> <br />AGENDA #2 - PUBLIC HEARING ON SETBACK AND HEIGHT OF NEW SINGLE <br />FAMILY DWELLINGS: <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff reported that a public hearing had been set to consider citizens' <br />comments on the Plan Commission's response to the Council's request for a review of <br />the zoning requirements for new single family dwellings. He said that the Plan <br />Commission and staff studied the subject, included input from interested citizens on all <br />sides of the issue and subsequently recommend that the zoning ordinance be amended <br />to include two new requirements: <br /> <br />1. In neighborhoods where there is no established or platted building set back lines, a <br />new house would have to meet the average for that neighborhood. <br /> <br />2. When proposed new housing construction exceeds the neighboring house by more <br />than fifteen feet, a special set back in the side yard of eight feet would be required <br />rather than the standard five feet. <br /> <br />The City Manager said that following the Public Hearing and the accompanying public <br />comments, the City Council may introduce legislation and vote on it in two weeks. <br /> <br />The Mayor then declared the Public Hearing open AT 7:35 p.m. <br /> <br />Tom Harig, 7814 Greensfelder, read a statement by Tom Engelhart. In this statement, <br />he noted that housing setback lines were originally established to allow sunlight into the <br />street and he believed that this common requirement has been overturned in our <br />neighborhoods. He stated that his studies of Clayton, Ladue and Olivette showed that <br />they uniformly adhered to established building lines. He cited housing at Gay and <br />Teasdale, 7831 Lafon and 515 East Drive as examples where such concern was not <br />shown in University City. Using 7831 Lafon Place as an example, he said that the <br />structure sticks out about 10 ~ feet closer to the street than the main. In the morning, it <br />blocks a good deal of the light that once reached 7838 Lafon and by late afternoon, the <br />building darkens the house at 7827 Lafon. He believed that the appearance of <br />residential neighborhoods has been affected. He hoped that Council agreed with the <br />Plan Commission and accepted their front yard set back recommendation. <br /> <br />Nancy Sachar, 8044 Lafon Place, said that she welcomed the new zoning proposals but <br />felt that they did not go far enough. She said the concept of the standard thirty foot <br />back yard, five foot side yard, and twenty five foot front yard was inaccurate. She cited <br />the City of University City's regulations and expressed her desire that the appropriate <br />boundaries are maintained. <br /> <br />Ralph Bowser, 8050 Teasdale Avenue, expressed his support for the proposed <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />