My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-05 Regular Agenda
Public Access
>
City Council Agenda
>
2007
>
2007-11-05 Regular Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2007 5:07:30 PM
Creation date
11/1/2007 5:07:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Administrative Requirements <br />We anticipate that Charter Communications will eventually apply for video service <br />authority to the PSC. This will trigger the need for a response from you to the provider to <br />preserve franchise fee revenues. You will also need to respond to any future providers <br />who apply for video service authority to the PSC to establish similar franchise fees. If <br />you receive notice of PSC video service authority from Carter Communications, or from <br />any other provider, please contact us or your city attorney immediately. <br />The Implementing Legislation <br />SB284 address a number of regulatory and land use issues that affect municipalities. <br />These issues have been addressed in the accompanying ordinances as video service <br />regulations and zoning regulations. <br />A. Video Service Provider Ordinance. <br />The video service ordinance incorporates and implements SB284’s new standards for the <br />provision of video programming. Section 1 of the ordinance ratifies existing cable <br />television franchises and regulations, including franchise fees, until such time as SB284’s <br />franchise authority comes into being. As noted above, Charter may decide to abide by <br />existing franchise regulations until franchise expiration, so this section ensures the <br />continuity of the germane cable regulations in that event. <br />Section 2 of the ordinance addresses those issues unique to video service providers. <br />These encompass general administrative requirements of SB284, including regulations <br />pertaining to franchise fees and the provider’s indemnification of the city. Section 2.C of <br />the ordinance requires that video service providers adopt the limited customer service <br />regulations established by SB284, and it allows the city to partake in mediation, and <br />1 <br />complain to the PSC, for customer service violations. Section 2.D implements those <br />regulations permitted by SB284 with regard to public, educational, and government <br />access programming, including PEG financial support (CALOP funding), and it includes <br />a sunset clause, mandated by SB284, which extinguishes all mandatory PEG <br />requirements as of January 1, 2012. After that date, PEG programming will take place <br />only if paid for by the broadcasting PEG institution. This includes Charter’s current <br />CALOP contributions. <br />B. Zoning Ordinance. <br />The zoning ordinance addresses SB284 provisions germane to the placement and <br />appearance of video service facilities (e.g., boxes) on private property, but please note <br />that we have extended the City’s authority to the facilities of anyutility to be located on <br />private property. The regulations permitted by SB284 were intended to allow cities some <br />control over the location and appearance of video service boxes. We see no reason why <br />1 <br /> Note that SB284 does not permit a city to enforce customer service regulations through the municipal <br />court. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.