Laserfiche WebLink
d.Public process <br />i.Some attendees were curious on the public process and what has <br />to be approved by city council <br />ii.Concern over survey and easements <br />Summary of written comments <br />3. <br />a.I support the elbow bridge design. I am concerned about the continued <br />bottleneck at the bottom where the mixed uses continue on the narrow <br />path, it may increase danger. Recommend WashU work with University <br />City to improve the path (without clean-cut trees) Margaret Gray, <br />Parkview <br />b.Curb= danger for cyclists; leave alone. Go ahead and eliminate switch <br />back on campus side. <br />c.The ramps will be just as hazardous as the present. Please do nothing. <br />Daniel Howard, Parkview <br />d.I support the elbow option. Thanks! Bill Lowry <br />e.I support either change to the ramp. The elbow is attractive from the <br />standpoint of riding through the trees. Patty Feit, Ames Place <br />f.Check the Parkview property lines that butt into the bike path and let <br />those residents know about the project <br /> <br />