Laserfiche WebLink
Municipal Review <br />On June 21, after review of this proposal and public comments, the University City Parks Commission <br />voted to support the request to provide an easement along Greenway South for the University to <br />build and maintain the proposed improvements. <br />On July 13, after review of this proposal and public comments, the University City Urban Forestry <br />Commission voted 3 to 1 in support of the removal of 15-17 trees with the replacement of <br />approximately 42-43 new trees as well as groundcover. <br />On July 14, the University City Green Practices Commission reviewed the project and made some <br />comments regarding including more native species in the planting varieties. Generally, the Green <br />Practice Commission was supportive of the project. <br />Request <br />The Forest Park Parkway Bridge and ramp are inadequate for the capacity of users they serve. This <br />proposal by Washington University will create a state-of-the-art facility, add 27 trees, improve green <br />space and provide capacity for years to come. Washington University has engaged in an extensive <br />effort to ensure the design capacity is sufficient for future use and has conceived a design for the <br />ramp that would improve the experience for all users. This design requires changes to the ramp and <br />an easement to use vacant, underutilized property owned by University City. University officials and <br />their design team completed a thorough outreach process to review the proposal with residents in <br />surrounding neighborhoods to seek their input and to add their comments/suggestions to the design <br />review. The University also has shared this project with three University City Commissions and each <br />has endorsed this project. <br />In exchange for the easement, the University will build and maintain the pedestrian ramp and <br />landscape improvements as described in this proposal and maintain them in perpetuity. <br />Exhibits <br />1.GRG Memorandum November 7 2014 <br />2.Ramp comparisons <br />3.Landscape Plans <br />4.Community Engagement <br />tƩƚƦƚƭğƌ Ʒƚ ‘źķĻƓ ƷŷĻ tĻķĻƭƷƩźğƓ wğƒƦ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ CƚƩĻƭƷ tğƩƉ tğƩƉǞğǤ .ƩźķŭĻ tğŭĻ ЊЋ <br />