My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5-6-14 CPAC Kickoff Meeting Summary
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
2023 Comprehensive Plan
>
Archive (2015 Incomplete Update)
>
Comprehensive Plan Update - 2015 to present
>
Advisory Committee-Discussion Summaries
>
2014
>
5-6-14 CPAC Kickoff Meeting Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2017 12:52:13 PM
Creation date
11/28/2017 12:52:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There was a frequent focus on creating a vision for Olive as an employment and innovation district. <br />Some participants felt whereas the Delmar Loop is an entertainment, restaurant, and nightlife district, <br />- <br />use housing developments. Multiple groups stressed the need for quality affordable housing in <br />University City and felt that the Olive corridor should increase in density, including upper floors <br />dedicated to residential units. Further, participants recognized the value of the Asian population and <br />business community but felt that specialty programming was needed to better incorporate those <br />activities into the community. Ideas included more prominently promoting the presence of an <br />immigrant entrepreneurship district to the larger St. Louis region, as well as the City facilitating <br />relationship-building activities with the adjacent, predominantly African-American residential <br />neighborhoods. One specific idea was to locate a Small Business Administration (SBA) satellite office on <br />Olive with an expertise in immigrant business development. <br />Entrepreneurship & Employment Growth <br />Another nearly unanimous vision was to transition University City from more of a residential and <br />participants felt University City was already organically growing as a center for entrepreneurship and <br />small business growth, but it was not effectively telling that story to the entire metropolitan area. <br />Residents stated they would prefer to see employers located in the City rather than big box stores and <br />other retailers, and felt the City should consider incentive tools to stimulate this kind of development, <br />including using TIF Districts, enterprise zones, and other strategies. Some participants felt that University <br />City is well positioned near four-year universities (i.e. Washington University, St. Louis University, UMSL) <br />but that the area would benefit from technical and vocational skills training schools, which could be an <br />integral part of local employment growth. Groups felt the Cunningham industrial district as well as Olive <br />Boulevard were the best locations to invest in incubator spaces, small business development zones, and <br />student-led innovation facilities, and such efforts should be coordinated (if not owned) by these <br />adjacent universities. <br />Neighborhood Stabilization & Reinvestment <br />Every group expressed concerned about the long- <br />neighborhoods and placed a high priority on programs and projects that enhanced these areas and <br />raised property values. Although the <br />throughout the City, there was a focus on the 3 rd ward and with multi-family housing properties in <br />particular. Groups stated that policies and programs need to be developed to address the high <br />concentration of rental housing, absentee landlords, frequent property maintenance issues, more <br />regular code enforcement, and targeting vacant structures, which some participants noted are often <br />rd <br />abandoned and accommodating squatters. Specifically, participants felt that crime in the 3 ward must <br />be more pro-actively addressed, that vacant lots must be filled by either new homes, community <br />gardens, or pocket parks. <br />g goals and <br />plans and better coordination could be achieved. Participants noted the need for more senior housing as <br />well as affordable housing units, and proposed using upper-floors of new mixed-use projects as a <br />location for at least some of these residential units. A specific proposal was for the City to create a non- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.