Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1895 <br />August 23, 2003 <br /> <br />makes the decisions that should be made by a master plan. She stressed the <br />importance of choosing a site and of designing the first building as an <br />incremental step leading to the next step. As the City has already determined a <br />site, site-selection cannot be an incremental step. There is no space to build a <br />large facility unless the baseball diamond is removed. The first step of an <br />incremental program must demonstrate vision and the ability to grow. A building <br />cannot be shown as designed for growth in the forthcoming five or ten years <br />without prior planning. She acknowledged the Council's desire to move forward, <br />but asked members to be clear about the first step in an incremental approach <br />and how it will affect the future. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams said the Parks Commission never viewed these improvements as <br />part of a program for growth nor considered how they would affect these <br />measures under discussion. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch suggested the building might require growth or retro fitting in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman assumes that if the Council proceeds, the design will include <br />features agreed upon by the Parks Commission and Proposition K: the staff and <br />volunteer offices, the meeting rooms, the kitchen, the storage space, etc. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner see the incremental approach as the sensible expansion of already <br />existing entities with problem areas, such as consolidating the soccer dome, <br />improving the basket ball court and the fitness center, and installing the track. <br />He noted that this building is the last to be added to Heman Park. The existing <br />three functions need to be expanded and improve, and then a master plan can <br />ensue. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharp asked about expanding upwards as part of the design. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams said upward expansion must be reflected in any original design, <br />and Mr. Ollendorff reiterated that Elsie Glickert had contributed this point at an <br />earlier meting. He stressed the need to share this view with the design teams. <br /> <br />Mr. Munkel referred to the construction of the soccer field as an historical <br />example, advising that it was originally an ice-skating rink with no walls which <br />was converted for use by the soccer teams in an effort to serve the needs of the <br />citizens, but that it was never considered to be an adequate facility. Plans to <br />improve it are now the next step. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams asked for recommendations. Although there is not unanimity, <br />there is consensus to construct a new facility with these features; <br /> <br />1. an elevated track wide enough for six lanes <br />2. a fully-equipped locker room <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />