Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1898 <br />September 29, 2003 <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe moved to approve, and Mr. Munkel seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Tony Gallina, Fitness Showcase, 1521 Page Industrial Boulevard, questioned the award <br />of the bid as it pertains to the specifications. Citing the Invitation to Bid list, which listed <br />three kinds of equipment to be purchased, he pointed out that two categories of <br />specifications exist: general and preferred. He also alluded to Item R, which demanded <br />safety as the top priority for selection of equipment. While the "preferred" category did <br />define safety features, his concern centers on not knowing which category was selected <br />by the City: general or preferred, and upon assuring that equipment meets required <br />safety specifications. It is important that he knows which of the "three lines" of <br />equipment available, is the line selected. Mr. Ollendorff advised that all bids are open <br />for pubic inspection and invited Mr. Gallina to come in to examine them. He also <br />expressed willingness to note any discrepancies found by Mr. Gallina., and to report <br />them to the Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch said she did not understand what Mr. Ollendorff said "at the top", as to the <br />procedure for soliciting bids. Did we ask bidders to bid two separate lines? It seems <br />that we asked for a number of things, but did we make sure everyone bid on the same <br />thing? Did we ask for a bid on the preferred line of equipment, taking safety into <br />account? There is a $13 thousand difference in the preferred line. So are you <br />recommending equipment that is the safest we can get? Mr. Ollendorff then said the <br />recommendation was for equipment that meets the City's specifications and all of its <br />safety requirements, and that is not to say that it does not exceed them by some <br />margin. More expensive equipment may exceed specifications. Different alternatives <br />were sought and received from bidders. The lowest one did not meet all specifications <br />nor did it include all items. The next lowest bid did meet all specifications and provided <br />all items required. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch asked if, when the bid was issued, the City was asking for one thing? Mr. <br />Ollendorff then asked Mr. Moton, Assistant City Manager, to clarify the bid process. <br />Mr. Moton explained that when deciding upon equipment, the City provides general <br />specifications for the manufacture or structure of the equipment, but did not specify the <br />sole source, the contract, as several manufacturers make the same equipment. Each <br />vendor was entitled to read the specifications and provide a product line they felt met <br />these specifications. The City also asked for them to specify where and how the <br />product deviated from the specifications. Staff evaluated the stated deviations to <br />determine if they were materially significant or if they were benign. Each vendor <br />provided either one or two different product lines. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch said her question came from the point raised by Mr. Gallina: did the City <br />ask for two options? Mr. Moton then reviewed the bid process undertaken. First, the <br />City designated the general type of equipment wanted, i.e. bench press, not a specific <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />