Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1900 <br />November 3, 2003 <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff commented that this was the last action of approval by the City <br />Council for this project, and he stated that this project will be an excellent <br />addition to the neighborhood, adding to the outstanding diverse stock of housing <br />choices. He commended the developers for bringing the project to the City. <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8688 - AMENDING CHAPTER 2.66 OF THE UNIVERSITY CITY <br />MUNICPAL CODE, RELATING TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FEES, BY <br />REPEALING SECTION 2.66.050(b) THEREOF, RELATING TO BUILDING <br />PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE, AND ENACTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW <br />SECTION WITH THE SAME SECTION NUMBER AND TITLE, THEREBY <br />AMENDING SAID SECTIONS SO AS TO ADD PLANNING AND <br />DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR FENCE PERMITS TO COVER THE COST OF <br />PROVIDING THE SERVICES; CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND <br />PROVIDING A PENALTY. <br /> <br />The bill was given its second reading. <br />The bill was given its third reading. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner moved approval, and Mr. Munkel seconded the motion. The roll call <br />vote was as follows:AYES-Mr. Munkel, Mr. Wagner, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. Welsch, <br />Mr. Sharpe, Ms. Colquitt and Mayor Adams. Bill Number 8680 was passed <br />unanimously and became Ordinance Number 6456. <br /> <br />BILL NO. BILL NO. 8689 - AMENDING CHAPTER 9.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL <br />CODE, RELATING TO OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC PEACE AND DECENCY, <br />BY ENACTING THEREIN NEW SECTIONS TO BE KNOWN AS SECTION <br />9.08.260 UNLAWFUL HOUSING PRACTICES-DISCRIMINATION IN <br />HOUSING," SECTION 9.08.270 DISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC <br />ACCOMODATIONS PROHIBITED-EXCEPTIONS," AND "SECTION 9.08.280 <br />UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES-EXCEPTIONS;" CONTAINING A <br />SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING A PENALTY. <br /> <br />The bill was given its second reading. <br />The bill was given its third reading. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe moved approval, and Ms. Welsch seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Munkel noted that this bill has no demonstrated need in the City, and he is in <br />favor of defeating it. Mr. Wagner respectfully disagreed with Mr. Munkel, <br />pointing out that it is a civil rights issue, and the need is as great today as it was <br />in the 1960's, when the first public accommodation and fair housing law was <br />passed ensuring open access to businesses and housing to people of all colors <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />