My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-05-12 Budget Study
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2004
>
2004-05-12 Budget Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:50:13 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 11:50:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
5/12/2004
SESSIONNUM
1920
TYPE
BUDGET STUDY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Session 1920 <br />May 12, 2004 <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said that most of the reductions in this budget are postponing capital, for <br />example, the deleted contingency funds in the Street Division. Another example is the <br />delayed projects in the Park Department. <br /> <br />Golf Course - there are no major changes. <br /> <br />Recreation - there are no major changes, but about $20,000 has been added to cover <br />the cost of program expansion. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch asked if the money generated by Proposition K was enough to build the <br />recreation center, to hire staff, and to increase maintenance and programming, and <br />whether this $20,000 was enough to do this, and Mr. Ollendorff said that the $20,000 <br />was part of the funds, and that there are also increases in Aquatics fees to provide <br />funds for expansion of programs. She then asked the City Manager to delineate the <br />specific amounts, subtracted from the total $500,000, that will be used to pay for the <br />recreation center, and how much will be used for programs, maintenance, etc. His <br />response was that $429,000 equals the payment, leaving $75-$90 thousand dollars for <br />debt rather than programs. Consultants advised funds would come from fees to off-set <br />costs and the amount needed for the budget is the net cost, $80 to $100 thousand <br />dollar range, most of which is in "pieces" like those just pointed out. <br /> <br />One problem to be faced later this fiscal year is start-up expenses, staff and program <br />development costs starting before the facility opens and before revenue is forthcoming. <br />That will necessitate finding $30 to $50 thousand dollars in start-up operating funds that <br />will not be off-set by revenue. The budget is based upon the long-range picture, <br />operating upon on-going income, but there is going to be a three month period with <br />expense and not much income, and the City Manager reported that he has not yet <br />"come to grips" with that. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt asked if summer playground youths had been allocated to the soapbox <br />derby, and Mr. Ollendorff said staff in both Parks and in Recreation would assist. He <br />said the City allocated staff only to programs authorized by the City Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot asked where expanded exercise programs for senior citizens could be inserted <br />into the budget, and Mr. Ollendorff said at this line item. He asked for suggestions <br />about other programs from the Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch asked what the reasoning was behind allocating all current funds to line <br />items now, as opposed to setting aside funds for programs which start in the spring. Mr. <br />Ollendorff said care would be taken to avoid incurring expenses in hiring staff until the <br />City Council had approved a budget to take action. He said he will return to the City <br />Council with a request start-up funds and he will also need to demonstrate where the <br />revenue will come from; he has neither answer yet and probably will not for a few <br />months. <br /> Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.