My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-05-03
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2004
>
2004-05-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:50:13 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 11:51:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
5/3/2004
SESSIONNUM
1918
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Session 1918 <br />May 3, 2004 <br /> <br />University City Costs <br />Lifeguards Unlimited <br />Midwest Pool <br /> <br />$199,733.00 <br />$221,224.00 <br />$190,307.00 <br /> <br />The City Manager recommended an award be made to Midwest Pool in the amount of <br />$190,307. The Park Commission unanimously endorsed this proposal to provide more <br />experienced professional pool management with cost savings to the City. City staff will <br />collect all fees and sell all concessions, in addition to contact oversight. Our high quality <br />recreation management team will be able to concentrate their attention on expanded <br />recreation programming. Midwest Pool comes highly recommended by leading area <br />aquatic facility owners. <br /> <br />Terri Thomas, 6949 Mitchell, described herself as a teacher in University City School <br />District, as a former Midwest pool employee, and as the mother of a lifeguard. She <br />opposes the management company because she believes the resident City lifeguards <br />provide a "sense of community" and do a better job than those who work for a <br />management company. <br /> <br />Richard Dockett, 6844 Crest Avenue, said that using a pool management company is <br />an example of "improper out-sourcing" and will introduce conditions not wanted "for our <br />grandchildren." <br /> <br />Ethel Mariam, 7257 Amherst Avenue, prefers University City lifeguards and is opposed <br />to an outside management company. <br /> <br />Carol Rossel, 7407 Teasdale Avenue, said that the School District had tried out- <br />sourcing maintenance and it resulted in poor management, poor maintenance, and cost <br />over-runs. She favors giving the new park director a chance to run things, and noted <br />that this is a "time of transition" and not a good time to introduce this change. <br /> <br />Mary Ann Zaggy, 6303 McPherson Street, said there would be no better service from a <br />management team than the City has currently. She is opposed to lifeguards serving in <br />a "pool of people" on call with the pool management service. <br /> <br />Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel Avenue, said this pool management issue came as a big <br />surprise. She wants to learn what advantages this form of management has to offer. <br />She attempted to attend the meeting of the Park Commission where it was discussed, <br />but the time of the meeting was changed and she missed the discussion. She alleged <br />that this is a violation of the Sunshine Law. She wants the pool to continue as it has <br />been since 1933. She also conducted some brief research into neighboring <br />communities and learned that Clayton hires their own lifeguards, but Crestwood, <br />Kirkwood and Webster Groves employ Midwest Pool management service. She objects <br />to lifeguards being part of an "employee pool." Citizens, she said, should know when the <br />commissions meet. <br /> Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.