Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1927 <br />June 28, 2004 <br /> <br />pointed out that the City pays the greater burden of the cost of repair of the alley. There <br />will be a chance to discuss the final assessment rate with them, but not before August, <br />when the final cost is set by certification. The charge of $200 per year for ten years has <br />already been stated and accepted by these citizens. The City Council adopted the <br />resolution outlining the charge which stated that all residents would pay the same, equal <br />amount. After the cost is certified, the Council has the opportunity to change the cost, <br />but it does conflict with the formerly stated policy. With storm sewers, charges can be <br />altered because it is a different issue from the alley repairs. The City sent letters asking <br />alley users to contribute to the repair costs and the Council approved the contract a <br />month ago. Some residents have changed their minds because they do not want to pay <br />the fees to make the improvements, but the City Manager said it is too late, because the <br />contract has been signed. There is flexibility on the interest rate charged to residents, <br />however. It is required to discuss this on a public agenda. Before the Council made <br />this decision, the question was raised as to whether all the residents understood the <br />policy, how it worked, and how it affected them, and the understanding was that all of <br />these points were covered with residents. <br /> <br />Future Use of the Community Center - Ms. Brot wished to formerly state a possible <br />conflict of interest regarding this subject. She said that she is an employee of the Mid- <br />East Area Agency on Aging, yet she does not set policies in nutrition centers for senior <br />centers. She does, however, have a personal interest in improving the University City <br />senior center. She will withhold voting on this issue if the Council feels that she should. <br />The City Manager reported the City is discussing with the MEAAA how to move the <br />Ochs Senior Center to one side of the Community Center. At one point, the Senior <br />Service Board did not want to move, but now they are willing to do this. Recently, there <br />has been work on how to accommodate other day-time users of the Community Center. <br />A proposal will be ready in a month or so, for consideration by the Council. He asked <br />the Council if there were any objections with these plans. Discussion on features of the <br />kitchen and its use followed. Specific delineation of use of the kitchen will be shared <br />with Council in the future. There was a question about program revenue and the City <br />Manager said he needed to ask the Director of Parks and Recreation for additional <br />information about program revenue and expenditures. Mayor Adams reiterated that the <br />question to be answered was, should the City continue to negotiate with MEAAA for use <br />of half of the facility? The consensus was that they should do so. <br /> <br />The City Manager said it was necessary to declare a Special Session in order to <br />introduce a bill and to vote upon the contract for the recreation facility, so Mayor Adams <br />declared that the City Council was in Special Session. In addition to Mayor Adams, the <br />following members of the Council were present: <br /> <br />Ms. Cassandra Colquitt <br />Ms. Francine Brungardt <br />Mr. Robert Wagner <br />Ms. Stefany Brot <br /> Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />