Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1935 <br />September 27, 2004 <br /> <br />Arlena S. Mason, 7830 Greensfelder Lane, addressed the water problem from the point <br />of new construction and the problems resulting from re-grading of the land. New <br />construction caused run-off. Traffic uses her driveway to turn around, because it is the <br />only viable method to do so. There is no adequate space for heavy equipment to turn <br />around. These are her reasons for opposing the measure. <br /> <br />Anne Clarke, 7904 Teasdale Court, said her lot is adjacent to the lot featured in the <br />proposal and she is concerned about issues of water run-off, construction debris, and <br />re-grading effects, so she opposed the plan. <br /> <br />Kathy Meath, 523 Warder Avenue, said her back yard faces the lane. She conducted <br />historical research on the area, which she shared with the Council, noting that "the back <br />lot was designated as Greensfelder Park" in perpetuity. She questioned the division of <br />the property as disrupting the park and asked how the building will affect the root <br />systems of trees? <br /> <br />Craig Jung, 519 Warder Avenue, opposes disrupting the integrity of Greensfelder Lane <br />and opposes tearing down a house that is in good condition as well a disrupting healthy, <br />living trees. <br /> <br />Jeffrey C. Kaiser, 537 Warder Avenue, is a near-by property owner who is concerned <br />about the direct effect of rain run-off on his property and its ability to attack his property. <br />He also mentioned the issue of set-back and how it would affect his property, including <br />the significant loss of trees and green space and how it affects his property values. <br /> <br />Nancy Wagoner, 7848 Greensfelder Lane, a resident, mentioned Title 16 of the <br />University City Building and Zoning Code and how it relates to the safe access and <br />maneuvering of emergency vehicles, stating this is not possible if cars or trucks are <br />parked on both the north and south sides of the street in front of the newly-proposed <br />sub-divided lot, which is the narrowest part of the Lane. There is a single point of <br />access, only, which additional cars will compromise. She asked for Council support to <br />maintain the integrity of Greensfelder Lane. <br /> <br />Mike Greenwood, 7840 Greensfelder Lane, described himself as a "voice of the <br />neighborhood" and asked the Council for their support in opposing this plan. <br /> <br />Marvin Frumhoff, 8023 Tulane Court, lives and works in University City, and mentioned <br />how the values of property here have escalated recently. His opposition to the plan is <br />that it would change the over-all ambiance of the street as well as its property values. <br /> <br />Eric Schmitt, Attorney for Petitioner Anselmo, 168 North Meramec, said that all the <br />minimum requirements of the City have been met and then he questioned whether they <br />were relevant at this point. He commented that the value of the proposed property was <br />high and suggested it should affect property values positively. As for water issues, <br /> Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />