Laserfiche WebLink
Session 868, Minutes' <br />June 19, 1967 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />body such as the Human Relations Commission who knows the over-all value <br />of the City and has a good feel for its value. He asked Dean Lesar whether <br />the Commission has given this a great deal of consideration - whether they <br />have compared it perhaps to the ordinance which concerns harrassment over <br />the telephone or any other laws on the books where direct action can be <br />gotten. <br /> <br />Dean Lesar said he thinks "you have to rely to a considerable extent on <br />citizen help and this is really the problem which the ttuman Relations Com- <br />mission faces - this is the difficulty of getting citizens to come forward <br />with evidence in any particular case. We simply get what we can and in- <br />vestigate any complaints that we receive and then we try to work with the <br />real estate people to enforce, in effect, the standard of conduct - to get <br />them to agree to it and this is going to be the problem and it may be as <br />Mr. Kohn suggests that if you give the citizen an additional reason to come <br />forward with evidence he would be more likely to do it. I, at least, per- <br />sonally, don't see any harm in it and it may be that it would be an in- <br />ducement to get people to come fo~¢ard with the evidence." <br /> <br />Mr. Fred Mishow, 711 Eastgate, next to be heard, said he wants to voice <br />his support of what Mr. Eohn and Mr. Fowler said to the effect that the <br />citizen should be allowed to take direct action by calling the police. <br /> <br />Mayor Kaufman again called attention to the motion by Councilman Lieber- <br />man, which had not yet been seconded, <br /> <br />Councilman Epstein said she would like to make the following amendment to <br />Bill No. 6403: Section 2 (b) the word "may" be substituted for the word <br />"shall~' in the first line. <br /> <br />Councilman Lieberman said he would like to speak to that. He doesn't agree <br />that this should be done because he feels one of the primary obligations <br />of any group that is going to be working with this particular Bill, if it <br />becomes an Ordinance, must be, and shall be as it says in the Bill, keep <br />track of the names and addresses of all real estate brokers and real es- <br />tate salesmen acting as such within the City. Councilman Lieberman said <br />this is very important and not only has he brought this out many times, <br />but Mr. Lorenz (Executive Secretary of the Commission on Human Relations) <br />and Councilman Woods have also brought this out: lack of communication <br />with the real estate people operating within University City is deplorable <br />and Councilman Lieberman expressed the view that the City must keep this <br />area wide open so that it can communicate with them properly, but this <br />can't be done if the City doesn't know who they are. He said that today <br />the City doesn't know who they are - doesn't know what real estate <br />agencies are operating within the City. He said, "You can't go to the <br />State Commission and say 'give me a listing of the thousands and thousands <br />of real estate agencies you've got' and just guess as to which ones are <br />operating in this area - they're not listed on the Boards because the <br />Boards don't include all of them by any means - there are a bunch of <br />independents that are working in this City as well as many others - we <br />have no idea who these people are - they can hurt us and they can hurt <br />our future residents - people who are going to be paying taxes here for <br />the next many, many years - by not letting these people know what their <br />obligations are, not only to their customers, not only to their clients, <br />but to this City as well. We've got to communicate with them to do it <br />and I see as a natural thing for some group, somewhere, somehow, to.keep <br /> <br /> <br />