My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/05 Special
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2005
>
02/22/05 Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2005 8:16:29 AM
Creation date
3/8/2005 8:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
2/22/2005
SESSIONNUM
1952
TYPE
SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Session <br />February 22, 2005 <br /> <br />Council's diligence, both past and present. After the last comprehensive plan which <br />encouraged new housing development but in a way that was conducive to maintaining <br />neighborhoods, the Council debated how wide side yards should be. It is not just words <br />on a page but represents real effort. Some discussion on these points ensued. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner sympathized with the residents' comments and understood their frustration, <br />but any aspersion on the City Council as the cause of the problems is not right. The <br />core determining factor is case law and it is in the courts that decisions are made. <br />Case law has been made and it is against what "we're trying to do" and it is not the City <br />Council, so he objected to casting aspersion on the City Council and the City staff for <br />causing his frustration. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said the City's zoning standards are regularly reviewed and gone over <br />painstakingly by the City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagoner asked why have a plan at all if it cannot be enforced? It gives people a <br />false sense of security by suggesting a plan can be referred to and that something can <br />be accomplished. He does not understand why it does not stand up to case law and <br />asked why not? <br /> <br />Ms. Brungardt said this is another instance of how local democracy has been lessened <br />in power. It is unfortunate that we cannot say what we want for ourselves and make it <br />so, but we have a legal system that has run into local democracy. One of the important <br />things to be learned as a community is how to address this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said this is the rule of law and the law cannot be what "Frank and Bob <br />think is nice." It must be spelled out in great detail so that there is understanding for all <br />-it must have measurable standards. Statements do not have any legal meaning. <br />There must be a specific standard and definition before a democratic decision can be <br />enforced. It cannot be based upon what people like or dislike. Mayor Adams added that <br />a standard must be consistent not capricious. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot said she is distressed that "people cannot keep a viable neighborhood" that <br />they have built. She does not understand why people cannot continue what they want <br />in their neighborhood. Mr. Ollendorff said the job is to define it so that it can be <br />enforced. Decide what you want to define, come up with specific measures to define it, <br />and take it to the point that seven elected officials agree. Ms. Brot asked why there had <br />to be a huge change and why the neighborhood system of single houses is challenged. <br />We are going to try; we need legal advice and we are going to write something that will <br />stand up in court. <br /> <br />Adjournment <br /> <br />Mayor Adams said the next regular meeting is Monday, March 7th and declared the <br /> Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.