Laserfiche WebLink
<br />session 1576, Minutes <br />August 17, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />submitted a 25-signature petition in SUWOrt of conti.nui.rq the ban. <br /> <br />Mr. Paul Patterson, 7030A DartnDuth, agreed with Mr. Skiple, notin] that sta- <br />tion wagons, minivans, etc. are the same size as small trucks, am people buy <br />these vehicles because of their versatility. He felt light vehicles should <br />be allowed to park on city streets at any time. <br /> <br />Mr. Stephan Glickert, 7750 Blackberry, asked hOVl many will be acx:x::t11lOOdated by <br />the proposed charge, am the Mayor said not many. He noted that Council was <br />doin] many thinJs to beautify the City, but this chan;Je would be detrimental. <br /> <br />Ms. Kathryn D.1biel, 7030A DartnDuth, said the City's ban on truck parkin] is <br />an unwarranted hardship on residents with small trucks. She noted that park- <br />in] of other small vehicles is not prohibited by virtue of state licensin] <br />laws, am she felt all domestic, non-ccmnercial vehicles should be allowed to <br />park on the street. She added that a lot of cars in the City are in worse <br />condition than many trucks. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Nellin], 850 Warder, CWJSed any chan;Je in the truck parkin] laws. <br />Although trucks are marketed for personal use, he felt there was a difference <br />between them am vehicles like minivans. He said there was a correlation be- <br />tween camrm.mities that demand high st.armrds am quality of envirornnent, am <br />the kind of people they attract. He felt the current law should be kept. <br /> <br />Ms. Bette Bush, 200 I...:imen, also CWJSed charges in this law. She said uni- <br />versity City has improved its housin] through its inspection process, which <br />has helped make it a desirable ccmnunity in which to live. She said there <br />was no good reason to charge the law since by l10Irl alIrost everyone knows about <br />it, am it would lower property values. Also, trucks parked on the street <br />give the appearance of a camnercial rather than a residential area. <br /> <br />Ms. Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel, said several who could not atterrl wished to <br />be on record as CWJSed to the proposed truck parkin] charge-Ursula Calla- <br />han, Joe Myers, am Sam Lee, all of wham sent petitions with Ms. Glickert. <br />She believed University City residents did not want IOOdification of this law, <br />am said property values would be affected negatively if the law is charged. <br />She left a petition with 41 signatures. She said Council is charged with <br />protectin] the City am should continue to do so by leavin] the law as it is. <br /> <br />Mayor Majerus closed the public hearin] at 8:20 p.m. <br /> <br />LI<XJOR LICENSE - 6605 DElMAR OCUIEVARD <br /> <br />'!he city Manager recx:.mnended denyin] an application to sell all types of in- <br />toxicatin] liquor by the drink seven days a week at 6605 Delmar. Council's <br />long established policy is that new restaurants denonstrate their capabili- <br />ties durin] a six-month waitin] period before bein] granted a license, but <br />this business does not meet any of the criteria for which an cx::casional ex- <br />ception has been granted, Le., it is not a continuation of a previous busi- <br />ness nor an addition to a chain of similar operations. '!he applicant claims <br />a staff person told him the license would be approved, but Mr. Ollendorff <br />said he could not locate that person. '!he application is in order am the <br />