My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report to University City Council
Public Access
>
Advisory Board on Economic Dev
>
Report to University City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2007 1:03:26 PM
Creation date
5/2/2005 3:48:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C. Foster Development Opportunities <br /> <br />Development Opportunities <br /> <br />University City has a number of very promising opportunities to attract important new <br />investment that will enhance the economic and fiscal base of the community. Each site <br />presents the City with challenges and will require hard decisions on behalf of its <br />leadership and citizens. Because the City is mature and lacks easy and clear sites for <br />development, high costs and complexities of redevelopment are associated with all of <br />these opportunities. <br /> <br />In recommending that development be encouraged in the locations cited, it is assumed <br />that the City will seek to act as an effective and responsible public partner in the <br />inevitable public/private partnerships that will be required to achieve success. This <br />should include conducting all necessary due diligence to insure full knowledge of <br />challenges and possibilities and applying rigorous cost/benefit analysis to insure the <br />community receives fair and reasonable returns on its investments. The City's and <br />State's development incentives should be used where appropriate and effective, but <br />always with an eye to achieving the greatest possible net gain for the City and its citizens. <br /> <br />In addition to achieving aggressive fiscal and economic gains for the City, redevelopment <br />of the areas discussed here should seek to achieve broader environmental and social <br />objectives. To the extent feasible and reasonable, building and site developments should <br />follow "green" principles for energy and other resource efficiency and sustainability. <br />Likewise, the unique social, economic, and racial mix of the overall community should <br />be an inspiration for the creation of new contributions to the built environment that <br />contribute to that diversity. <br /> <br />1-170 Corridor Opportunities <br />· Village ofWyncrest - 840 units of housing at unusually low density <br />· The Barby Lane/W. Kingsbury neighborhood (west of#1 McKnight <br />Place) <br />· Delcrest Circle <br />· Olive and the Innerbelt <br /> <br />The Villages of Wyncrest <br /> <br />Formerly known as Canterbury Gardens, the Villages ofWyncrest is the largest and most <br />readily identifiable redevelopment opportunity within University City today. Located at <br />the Delmar Boulevard interchange on the region's 1-170 innerbelt corridor, the 58-acre <br />development consists of 840 rental apartment units in a complex of some 200 four-family <br />buildings. The project's relatively low gross density of 14.5 units per site acre, together <br />with its age, condition, and competitiveness relative to its market potential in central <br />county and adjacent to the Clayton central business district, suggest the potential for <br />redevelopment. It is understood that the project is currently owned by a Canadian <br />pension fund and is subject to limitations on its use and on the household income mix of <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.