Laserfiche WebLink
Budget Study Session <br />May 18, 2005 <br /> <br />going to have to give our committee a couple of weeks to study this in between. They <br />revised the study and added pieces to it in April or May. Ms. Brungardt added that the <br />Council was doing the budget. Mayor Adams responded that we didn’t have a finished <br />project; so we could have talked about it in ether; but it didn’t have any substance. Mr. <br />Ollendorff said that there wasn’t any budget money to allocate to it. Mayor Adams <br />confirmed that it didn’t have a budget impact. Ms. Brungardt said that you developed it <br />with a budget because your people were working on it on salary. Mr. Ollendorff <br />responded that we don’t have a project budget for planning. Ms. Brungardt stated that <br />when you have people meeting and working on something and they are being paid to <br />spend their time doing it, that’s a use of resources. Mr. Ollendorff agreed. <br /> <br />35.20 – Golf Course <br /> <br />There are no major changes. The thing that is different each year is the capital outlay. <br />Page C-65. Typical expenditures for the golf course are about $50,000 a year. This <br />year the highest priority needs are replacement of one of the mowers and to begin the <br />development of the concrete cart paths. The total cost of cart paths is in the $100,000 - <br />$200,000 range, so $30,000 is a small first step and keeps to what the Mayor said <br />about this budget being closely balanced with revenue. It is going to be a few thousand <br />more or less, but there is not a big drain on City revenue or a big contribution to City <br />revenue. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt asked what this amount would include, and was advised it would be applied <br />to the clubhouse and the first fairway because they are the most prominent and the <br />most visible and will be a good start for the foundation campaign. The site most needed <br />may be back in the hollow, but public policy dictates the one with the most impact rather <br />than the greatest need. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot asked about an item on page C-62 and whether it meant an increase and <br />application of ideas to encourage non-residents to use the golf course. Mr. Ollendorff <br />replied that Ron Akin, the golf pro, conducted promotions aimed at residents and non- <br />residents, both. There is an opportunity to increase the play through promotions and <br />special rates. There is also a special incentive to the golf pro to operate the golf course <br />and he works under contract. <br /> <br />Responding to Ms. Welsch, regarding the term of the golf pro’s contract, Mr. Ollendorff <br />said it’s ongoing three-year extensions he believes that every three years can be <br />extended for another three years, but he will check on it. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch asked if it is regular to have golf pro at a course the size of University City’s, <br />and Mr. Ollendorff advised that it is better to have golf pro run a course. Some <br />discussion on this topic followed about the benefits of this situation. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt asked if there was anything in the budget for updating the restrooms, and <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />