My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-12 City Council Study Session
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2009
>
2009-10-12 City Council Study Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2009 3:18:26 PM
Creation date
10/27/2009 3:18:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
10/12/2009
TYPE
STUDY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />MINUTES OF UNIVERSITY CITY COUNCIL <br />STUDY SESSION <br />October 12, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />The Council Study Session, held on the Fifth Floor of the City Hall, on Monday, October <br />12, 2009, was called to order by Mayor Joseph Adams at 5:30 p.m. The following <br />members of the Council were present: <br /> Mr. Terry Crow <br /> Mr. Michael Glickert <br /> Mr. Arthur Sharpe, Jr. <br /> Ms. Lynn Ricci <br /> Mr. Byron Price (arrived at 6:00 p.m.) <br /> Mayor Joseph Adams <br />Also present were the City Manager Julie Feier and City Attorney John Mulligan. <br /> <br />The study session was planned in order to go into more depth of performance <br />management. Performance management helps to produce quality services at the lowest <br />possible cost, engaging exceptional employees. Cities are asked to provide high quality <br />services as efficiently and effectively as possible. Presently at U City, all departments do <br />communicate to Council how they have performed each year through the year-end <br />Administrative Report. The report does not link to the Council’s strategic goals or internal <br />goals set by management. Performance management bases performance on <br />performance measures. A performance measure is how service is provided; where <br />citizens’ input is used through ongoing annual surveys. Measures are tied into specific <br />Council goals and are listed as data points for comparisons. From these data points a <br />continuous improvement plan can be developed. A municipality can start small with a few <br />data points and develop from there. Performance management can answer questions as <br />is the City performing at its optimum, is the City cost effective and is the City meeting the <br />expectation of its citizens. The performance-based management: <br /> <br /> has costs in the short and long term, <br /> <br /> will help the City to make better decisions that simultaneously improve the quality of <br />services at the same time, <br /> <br /> identifies savings and still supports the attainment and retention of excellent <br />employees. <br /> <br />Performance management will link performance directly to City Council and Department <br />goals and the City’s mission set forth in a Strategic Plan. <br /> <br />The process of transitioning to performance management is time consuming and the initial <br />upfront costs are substantial. The steps in the process are: <br /> <br /> develop a City mission statement and strategic plan <br /> <br /> create a performance management team <br /> <br /> develop, choose and collect data for performance measures <br /> <br /> perform a citizen survey <br /> <br /> begin performance management by assessing the data provided <br /> <br /> share the results with the community <br /> <br />The yearly and ongoing cost of the performance management program is $139,900. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.