06/24/96 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1670, Minutes June 24, 1996 Page 7 Mr. Schoomer commended Mr. Aboussie and his associates for the diligence with which they have at- tempted to meet the objections of both citizenry and administration. He also expressed admiration for Mr. Spizman, who is trying to find a satisfactory use for this difficult property; however, he felt the proposals made to limit density are not enforceable, and permitting this development would negatively impact the neighborhood, City, and city plan. He said the Code enjoins the Council from granting a variance which will adversely affect the rights of the adjacent property owners, and as he felt this would happen, he moved denial. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion. Mrs. Thompson said she has been concerned about Olive Boulevard for many years and felt the pro- posed project might solve some of the problems there; however, after listening to the residents, she realized they had some legitimate concems. She was very sony that something could not be worked out. All voted Aye. Mayor Adams thanked all concerned for their patience and forbearance on this matter. CONDITIONAL USE AMENDMENT - 6300 DELMAR The City Manager said Loop Automotive, 6300 Delmar, wishes to expand the auto repair use in this re- tail commercial pedestrian oriented neighborhood. Mr. Ollendorff concurred in the Plan Commission and staff recommendation to deny this request since the proposed expansion does not meet standards for conditional use approval. Specifically, at this location automobile service use works against the retail commercial character of the Loop; injury is caused to neighboring properties by inhibiting the pedestrian retail character; the proposal does not meet the requirement of being in compliance with the overall neighborhood development plan, including existing Zoning district provisions and the City's comprehen- sive plan, which directs that incompatible and inappropriate uses be excluded, and stronger pedestrian oriented retail and restaurant uses be encouraged. In short, the proposed use is incompatible with the surrounding area. Mr. Richard Byrd, 7801 Forsyth, attorney representing Loop Automotive, said although he realized Council does not like the way this business looks, that is not the issue. What Council must decide is whether the business should remain as it is now, or if it should be greatly improved as shown in the drawings he presented. He said there have been automotive uses on this site since 1916, so the owner, Mr. Feygelman, will not be leaving any time soon. Mr. Byrd said the proposed changes will be a great asset to University City compared to what is there now. He said the new facility will not increase traffic in the area nor require any new city services. Mr. Samuel Berger, said he and his partners just bought 6255 and 6263 Delmar (across the street from Loop Automotive) and plan to demolish these two buildings and put in about 20,000 feet of retail space. They are opposed to the expansion of Loop Automotive because it is an eyesore. Mr. Berger suggested that making threats of the kind made by Mr. Byrd are non-productive. Mr. Schoomer moved to take this item off the table. Mr. Wagner seconded, and all voted Aye.