Laserfiche WebLink
Regular meeting <br />September 19, 2005 <br /> <br />can impact other business that has not been managed yet. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe Jr. asked Mr. Ollendorff how soon or what is the procedure for bringing this <br />Bill back as soon as possible. Mr. Sharpe Jr. wanted to know if Mr. Ollendorff could <br />rewrite or write this Bill and have it ready for Council at our next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said that any one member of the Council can request separation and <br />introduction of the Bill. Mr. Sharpe Jr. requested Mr. Ollendorff to prepare it and Mr. <br />Ollendorff said he would give it to the City Clerk to put on the next City Clerk’s Agenda. <br />The other way to handle it would be to have someone who voted to defeat it to <br />reconsider and bring it back that way, but is more cumbersome way. Those are the two <br />ways of bringing back a defeated Bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch wanted to say to her colleague that she had hoped to have a Study Session <br />on this before we are asked to vote on the final passage of this Bill. Mr. Sharpe Jr. said <br />he would love to do that. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot said that when she saw the funds going down she wanted to emphasize that <br />we don’t know what is going to happen in our economy. I agree with Ms. Welsch that <br />we need to study it and see numbers that would show us that we have the money to <br />accomplish the Pension raise. I do not feel that it is a disturbance to the citizens. Once <br />we studied it and we feel there is no conflict of interest, there is no harm to people, and <br />we have the money, then I certainly would want to take it up again. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe Jr. asked Mr. Ollendorff to have it prepared and sent out to the Council and <br />we can then have a Study Session, we will have had time to look over the material. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot requested to have the Actuarial be present and the Fund Manager to go over <br />the Budget at the Study Session <br /> <br /> <br />BILLS FOR INTRODUCTION: <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe Jr. introduced <br />1. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 34 OF THE UNIVERSITY CITY <br />MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO ZONING, BY REPEALING SECTION <br />34.30.5 THEREOF, RELATING TO DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL <br />REGULATIONS IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND <br />ENACTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW SECTION TO BE KNOWN AS <br />“SECTION 34-30.5 DENSITY AND DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS,” THEREBY <br />AMENDING SAID SECTION SO AS TO REQUIRE CERTAIN LOTS TO <br />CONFORM TO THE PREVAILING PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT; <br />CONTAINING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING A PENALTY <br /> <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />