09/19/05 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular meeting September 19, 2005 Mayor Adams asked if there was a removal of the motion made and seconded. Mr. Wagner said his motion still stands. Mr. Adams said he could not understand Council’s motion when it was approved by the Pension Board which consists of employee representatives. He felt it was a slap in their face of the employees for their dedicated service and their work for the citizens of this community. There has been a motion on the floor to kill 8814 and was seconded. The motion passed four to three, with Sandi Colquitt, Arthur Sharpe Jr. and Mayor Adams voting NAY. Mayor stated that the majority of the Council has now told the employees that the City of University City, that we do not value their participation in this process of negotiation. Mr. Wagner objected to Mayor Adams statement as that was not what was said by the majority. Ms. Welsch wanted to go on record stating to Mr. Mayor that she does not believe that that was the message we were sending. I believe that the message we are sending to our citizens and to the members of our Pension Plan is that this Council wants to make these decisions when they feel they understand the Bill that is before them and they have enough background information to understand. In all due respect, today we have a move of $150,000 to be put into the Pension Plan, then we had two very similar Bills on the Docket of which we just found out the difference between at this meeting. I argue that we should sit down with staff and Pension Board members so that we understand as this is a lot of money that we are talking about and I think it should be presented in that way as opposed to that we don’t care about employee services, with all due respect I feel is Mayor’s words. Mayor Adams said that Mr. Sharpe Jr., Ms. Colquitt, Mr. Wagner and myself did have meetings dealing with these issues and everything was laid out. You all had printed handout materials. You had stuff from the Pension Board dealing with this and their recommendation. You had what the employees were asking for. If a member of the Council was not at that meeting I am sorry, but there is no way to have a meeting when everybody can be there all the time. He said he would agree that it was confusing when this other Bill came in, I will accept that. We did look at all of these percentages and the possibility of where to go in the future in dealing with this pension system and it was all talked about, it was all laid out. To continue to say that we have to continually go over and re-plow the same field is a disservice to the employees. Ms. Brungardt said that the defeat of this Bill has other pending business that this may have some relation to and until it is clear if whether or not there is a relationship between this particular amendment and other business that we are managing. She did not feel comfortable allowing this to go through. I can not vote on something that I feel Page 15