2006-05-06 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular Session June 5, 2006 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Deb Carlin, 7132 Washington Ms. Carlin has asked several times for the City to stake property lines before the City approves the vacation. She felt this property has been used for a walkway and is a scenic green view. She asked the City to reconsider before giving away 30 feet of real estate. Robert Jones, 7700 Bonhomme, 63105 Mr. Jones is the attorney representing the home owner adjacent to vacation property. Mr. Jones stated that the First Presbyterian Church was previously awarded the 30 feet adjacent to their property. This would just continue this 30 feet to the rest of the adjacent property owners. Public Hearing was closed at 7:18 p.m. AGENDA ITEM #3 — Public Hearing on Vacating Ahern – Drexel Alley A public hearing for the proposed vacating of the unimproved unopened alley at the rear of houses between the 7500 blocks of Ahern and Drexel. This vacating would add 7.25 feet to the rear of each adjoining property Public Hearing was opened at 7:20 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no speakers present. AGENDA ITEM #4 — Site Plan 8310 Olive It was recommended to approve a not-for-profit use of this property as a Place of Worship; all requirements were met. Mr. Price moved for approval, seconded by Mr. Sharpe, Jr., and approved unanimously. AGENDA ITEM #5 — Adoption of Comprehensive Plan Update of 2005. The Comprehensive Plan is updated every five years. The plan’s primary purpose is to guide economic development. Mr. Ollendorff concurred with the Plan Commission for adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Update of 2005, as revised January 25, 2006. This plan included most of the City Council’s requested revisions. Mr. Ollendorff said that implementation has already begun and will accelerate if Proposition U meets with voter approval. There are three additional requested revisions that are being studied by the Plan Commission; Change in the language of the previously passed provision by the Plan Commission making the 8600 block of West Kingsbury single family home No farther institutional development on this block. 1. A revision in the plan for the Hafner Court area. 2. Recommended usage of the property of the former offices for the U City school board. Mr. Price moved for approval and was seconded by Ms. Brot for purpose of discussion. Ms. Brot said the Council had worked very hard reviewing this proposed Comprehensive Plan. She passed out Table 18 of the Comprehensive Plan, Line 18 across; this indicated the preferred uses which the Plan Commission had already approved for the 8600 block of West Kingsbury: and low- density residential, no institutional use, and two-family dwellings. These were the preferred uses Page 3