Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Session 1312, Minutes Page 7 <br /> July 26, 1982 <br /> <br /> <br /> of delay would seriously impact the system, Mr. Ollendorff said there had been <br /> great difficulty running programs and obtaining data when the system was overload- <br /> ed, with both employee operators and the public experiencing long waits. Mr. Levy <br /> said he understood, but the focus of his question was whether or not, having lived <br /> with the problems to the point where it was decided that another system was needed, <br /> it was important for the Council to be able to give an intelligent approval of the <br /> administration's request, He said he was not able to do that at this time. <br /> Mr. Schoomer recommended acceptance of the proposal. Mrs. Metcalfe said she did <br /> not think she would learn anything new if the matter were delayed, but would be <br /> willing to do so in deference to Mr. Levy if he wished more time to consider the <br /> matter, <br /> I <br /> Mr. Levy said he thought he would know a great deal more about the proposal in a <br /> week than he knew at this time and he was not ready to vote on it now. (He had <br /> been out of town for the last week.) Mrs. Thompson said she was not ready to vote <br /> on the matter, either. <br /> F <br /> Mayor Mooney suggested that the proposal be approved, subject to Mr. Levy's study <br /> i of the matter within a time frame that would provide sufficient time to gather the <br /> information he wanted. Then, if Mr. Levy still has serious reservations, the mat- <br /> ter would be pos:poned until the next regular Council meeting August 23. <br /> Mr. Schoomer moved approval of the administration's recommendation, subject to Mr. <br /> Levy's review and report to the Council of his acceptance or other recommendation. <br /> In deference to that accommodation, Mr, Levy said he would try to report to Council <br /> within four or five days. Mrs, Metcalfe seconded the motion, which carried unani- <br /> mously. <br /> VACANT PROPERTY - TAX AND LIEN WAIVERS POLICY <br /> The City Manager said he had tried to write a specific policy for tax and lien wai- <br /> vers, but the policy, by its very nature, was quite general. The policy was sum- <br /> marized as follows: <br /> Guidelines apply only to property redeemed following tax sale by persons <br /> other than the owners at the time liens were incurred. <br /> Council will consider each case on its merits within these guidelines and <br /> will grant waivers in whole or in part based on the extent to which the <br /> best interests of the neighborhood and the City are served. <br /> <br /> The basic policy will be to waive back taxes and charges together with in- <br /> terest and penalties in the event of acquisition of an unbuildable parcel <br /> (by virtue of size, configuration, location, economics or other reason) <br /> by an adjacent owner. Waivers will be granted to non-adjacent owners if <br /> it can be clearly established that adjacent owners are not interested and <br /> if the applicant for waiver submits maintenance plans of benefit to the <br /> neighborhood. Depending on the merit of the proposed use and maintenance, <br /> part or all back charges will be waived. <br /> In the event of buildable property, again, a showing of no interest on the <br />