Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Session 1308, Minutes Page 4 <br /> May 24, 1982 <br /> <br /> they have a permit). Although he did not have figures, Mr. Rosenblatt said he un- <br /> derstood that the first week's income from permits at Heman Park was quite substan- <br /> tial. In response to Mr. Levy, Mr. Rosenblatt said he thought most members played <br /> at Heman and Flynn Parks; however, the Club was seeking members from all sections <br /> of the City. In view of budgetary constraints, Mr. Levy asked if the Club could <br /> not work out a system whereby the members could act as monitors. Mr. Rosenblatt <br /> said it was very difficult for a private citizen to inform those playing that they <br /> must either purchase a permit or leave the court. He noted that the Club projected <br /> that income from permits would come fairly close this season to covering the costs <br /> of a monitor. Mr. Levy asked if it would not be better to spend money.that would <br /> otherwise go to a monitor on resurfacing two more of the tennis courts at Heman <br /> Park. Mr. Rosenblatt thought it would be better to have a monitor who, in addition <br /> to his other duties, could also keep non-tennis players from using the courts for <br /> other activities, such as skateboarding. Mrs. Thompson said she thought all the <br /> parks should be equal, with-no favors given one side of a community as opposed to <br /> another. Mr. Rosenblatt said this point was discussed at the Park Commission meet- <br /> ing, and the conclusion reached was that Kaufman and Fogerty Parks are somewhat <br /> cloistered and not as accessible to non-residents; however, Flynn and Heman Parks <br /> have wider public exposure because of their locations. Mr. Lieberman asked Mr. <br /> Rosenblatt if he thought enough permits would be sold this year to offset the cost <br /> of a monitor at Flynn. Mr. Rosenblatt said the Club had projections to the effect <br /> 4 that the second year of operation would provide enough revenue to-cover the cost of <br /> monitoring services. Mrs. Metcalfe had two concerns. She said Flynn was a neigh- <br /> borhood park, as is Fogerty and Kaufman, but if this plan went into effect, casual <br /> players at Flynn would have to pay, whereas those at Fogerty and Kaufman could play <br /> free of charge, and she was not sure this could be justified. The only way this <br /> might be permitted was if conditions at.Flynn were sufficiently different from other <br /> parks that a monitor was necessary and permits required. In addition, if non- <br /> residents who have been playing at Flynn are denied the right to play there, she <br /> felt they would find out where the free parks are located and play there, eventual- <br /> ly requiring monitors at those parks, which would add greatly to City expenses. Mr. <br /> Rosenblatt said a two-court situation (as at Fogerty) could not justify the expense <br /> of monitoring. He said offering a choice gave citizens the option of paying for <br /> monitored courts or playing free where there was no monitoring. <br /> Mrs. Cathy Vanderpluym, 6948 Amherst, asked to address the Council. Mrs. Vander- <br /> pluym. said she and her family no longer use the Heman Park pool because of the lack <br /> of good management, and that she was aware of other families who felt as hers did <br /> on this matter. She requested that better management practices be put into effect <br /> in order to attract University City families back to the pool.. Mrs. Thompson sug- <br /> gested that a citizen committee be appointed to look into these allegations. Mayor <br /> Mooney said he had already asked the City Manager to investigate. Mrs. Metcalfe <br /> suggested that Mrs. Vanderpluym put her comments in writing and present them to the <br /> Park Commission. <br /> Mrs. Roberta Sidel, 7128 Washington, asked to address the Council on behalf of the <br /> University City Residential Service (UCRS). Mrs. Sidel related some of the activi- <br /> ties carried on by UCRS, noting that they have settled more than 7,000 families in <br /> University City. She requested that UCRS be allotted $26,400 for the 1982-83 fis- <br /> cal year, which is a 5% increase over the amount received from the City for each of <br /> the past three years. The increase would be used to slightly raise staff salaries. <br /> Mrs. Sidel said that UCRS has been instrumental in trying to desegregate housing <br />