Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Session 1303, Minutes Page 6 <br /> April 26, 1982 <br /> <br /> for a building of more than four stories which is closer to the nearest residence <br /> than that allowed in the Zoning Code. She asked if there were a precedence for <br /> giving this variance, and what the implications would be. She wished to have some <br /> assurance-that the variations in the proposal are consistent with what has been <br /> granted in the past. Mr. Ollendorff said he would get that information to her. <br /> PLANNING SURVEY CONSULTANT CONTRACT <br /> <br /> The City Manager said the City's Planning Department has been working, with Coun- <br /> cil approval, on updating the City's comprehensive or Master Plan. He recommended, <br /> as part of'this, the approval of a contract with Community Consultants for a citi- <br /> zen survey analysis in the amount of $1,875. Payment is to come from Community <br /> Development Block Grant funds. When the updating of the Master Plan is.completed, <br /> it will go to the Plan Commission and then to the City Council for approval. <br /> Mr. Lieberman asked what this survey would reveal that was not already known from <br /> the 1980 comprehensive census. Mr. Ollendorff said the survey would try to find <br /> out the attitudes of citizens concerning the adequacy of various City programs, <br /> such as housing assistance, residential and commercial development and other items <br /> which go into the City's Master Plan. Mr. Lieberman expressed reservations about <br /> the responses that might be given; however, Mr. Ollendorff said Community Consult- <br /> ants were considered quite skilled in doing surveys of this type. <br /> Mayor Mooney thought perhaps this should be tabled until the Council had more in- <br /> formation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lieberman said he failed to see that any cost benefit would be produced by this <br /> survey. Mr. Ollendorff said it was a significant part of the updating of the Mas- <br /> ter Plan, which the Council approved last year, and that it was important that the <br /> City know how its citizens felt about programs which are in effect here. He noted <br /> that the City's Master Plan had not been updated for more than 20 years, and that <br /> this was one step in the process of bringing it up to date. <br /> Mrs. Thompson asked for further information about the Master Plan, and Mr. Ollen- <br /> dorff asked Mr. Goldman to respond. <br /> Mr. Al Goldman, Director of Planning, said most cities have comprehensive plans to <br /> guide their development. University City had its first plan in 1920, which was re- <br /> vised in 1931 and again in 1958, but has not been totally revised since then. He <br /> said the survey was proposed to confirm or deny staff perceptions about the issues <br /> which concern citizens in the community. It was felt a professionally conducted <br /> survey would do that. Responding to Mrs. Thompson, Mr. Goldman said that the sur- <br /> vey would not ask citizens how they feel about the sign or zoning codes, but it <br /> was possible that changes might be made in some of the codes if it was indicated <br /> that citizens felt strongly about something they perceived as being wrong. He said <br /> the issues that the staff sees as being of concern, for example, might be mainten- <br /> ance of residential or commercial property, crime, or the role schools play in the <br /> community. There would be less emphasis on traditional concerns, since the City <br /> is already fully developed, and the need now is to pull all the loose ends togeth- <br /> er and to continue to make it work. <br /> Mr. Ollendorff apologized to the Council for not getting more background informa- <br /> tion to them, so they would be somewhat more prepared. <br />