Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1736, Minutes <br />December 7, 1998 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />period past 120 days. There is some concerns by both parties, with respect to the <br />document as it is drafted. TCI thinks that it would be in the best interest of both parties <br />to be able to sit down and go over that language and try to come up with other <br />language that would be more acceptable with regards to this change of control <br />document. They basically asked for an extension to go to January 27, 1999. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff replied that he believed this request had been received. He asked Mr. <br />Berra if there was anything else that was needed that the City should have. Mr. Berra <br />said that some information has been provided to Mr. Hines and Mr. Rose with some of <br />their concerns about the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Jeff Kiping, represents AT&T's government affairs division. Mr. Kiping said that <br />AT&T plans on providing an array of services to customers through the cable access, <br />including long distance, local, internet, broad telephony, pay-per-view and other cable <br />type services. AT&T, as outlined in the 394 document, does have the legal, financial <br />and technical capability for the change of the control that is required by the FCC. AT&T <br />has a good name, as far as customer quality and service. They also offer engineering <br />expertise in operating the most sophisticated telecommunications network in the world. <br />They are simply asking for an extension of time on the 120 days, in order to come to an <br />agreement on the terms of the ordinance. They respectfully request that Council allow <br />the extension to work out the rest of the details. <br /> <br />The Mayor summarized that the Council's options were to approve the ordinance as <br />submitted, or to amend the December 23rd to the year 2000, or to give an 120 day <br />extension. <br /> <br />Mr. Munkel clarified that Mr. Rose reported that if the Council did not act by January 7, <br />1999 that this merger would be in effect. Mayor Adams said that he was correct, unless <br />Council granted the extension. Mr. Munkel did not understand why a bill was prepared <br />and the two companies involved had not come to an agreement yet. Mayor Adams <br />responded that the problem was not with the two companies but that negotiations <br />needed to be finalized with the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe asked Mr. Ollendorff if he had a problem with the extension. Mr. Ollendorff <br />deferred the question to Mr. Rose. Mr. Rose responded that there was some question <br />about whether TCI has the legal authority to request an extension. On Friday, Mr. Rose <br />faxed to TCI a letter stating that they provide him, on AT&T letterhead, that they also <br />agreed with the extension. Staff did not receive the letter. For some reason, AT&T <br />does not appear to want to become the signatory on the franchise agreement. This is a <br />requirement of our existing franchise. This has been relayed to TCI several times. <br /> <br /> <br />