My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-07-23
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
1986
>
1986-07-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2005 4:10:41 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:03:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
7/23/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Minutes - Plan Commission <br />Page 3 <br />July 23, 1986 <br /> <br />Mr. Gantz noted that the last page of the Application listed the Landmark <br />Standards which, if adopted, would guide the Historic Preservation <br />Commission in decisions regarding proposed demolition and rehabilitation of <br />each of the three sites. The Commission would recommend preservation of the <br />original portions of each building and the basic relationship of the <br />buildings. Mr. Gantz reiterated that even absent local designation, the <br />Commission, as an advisory body to the Plan Commission and City Council, has <br />the power to review applications for demolition permits for all three school <br />buildings and would make recommendations regarding demolition to the Zoning <br />Administrator. Mr. Gantz realized that the issue regarding designation of <br />the Education District was the market status of Hanley Jr. High School which <br />is currently vacant and for sale by the School District. Should the <br />District be designated a local historic district, he said the School <br />District as well as the City would be able to present developers with a <br />clear view of the priorities and potential for the building's rehabilitation <br />and development of the site. <br /> <br />Chairman Hamilton called on Dr. Harold Dodge, Superintendent of University <br />City Schools, to clarify the school district's position on the Application. <br />Dr. Dodge stated that the School Board had been notified in March of the <br />recommendation that the three schools be included in a local historic <br />district. He and other Board members attended the public hearing held by <br />the Historic Preservation Commission in April to express their concerns <br />regarding the demolition and extensive design review that in his estimation, <br />would limit developers' options in rehabilitation of the building and thus <br />lower potential bids to purchase the property. The rising insurance costs <br />and continued deterioration of the Jr. High School building contributed to <br />the costs of keeping the property on the market and the consequent need for <br />an adequate return on its sale. <br /> <br />Dr. Dodge reported that the Board had received several low bids for the <br />purchase of Hanley Jr. High School - bids which, according to state law, <br />were too low for the Board to accept in the School District's interest. One <br />bid of over one million dollars had been accepted; however, the option <br />contract expired after the developer was unsuccessful in an attempt to raise <br />enough money for residential rehab of the building. A second million dollar <br />bid by the Midland Group of St. Louis would most probably fail because, <br />according to Dr. Dodge, the City was unwilling to rezone the site for a <br />retail commercial use and authorize demolition of the building. The Board <br />had consulted its own architects regarding rehabilitation costs. The Board <br />was advised that rehab for an education use would be too expensive; <br />rehabilitation costs for a residential use would be too expensive to support <br />a million dollar bid from any developer. Considering these factors, Dr. <br />Dodge stated that the Board opposed the Application because, in its <br />estimation, local designation would further restrict developer's options in <br />rehabilitation of the Hanley building and limit the School District's return <br />on sale of the building. The Board, however, would be willing to negotiate <br />alternative deed covenants for the site with the Historic Preservation <br />Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.