My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-07-23
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
1986
>
1986-07-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2005 4:10:41 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:03:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
7/23/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Minutes - Plan Commission <br />Page 2 <br />July 23, 1986 <br /> <br />Eastgate Avenue. She stated that an ordinance to that effect had been <br />introduced before City Council and would, she hoped, be passed at its August <br />meeting. Chairman Hamilton asked if the process of marketing the property <br />had begun. Ms. Fahey responded that a small printing company was interested <br />in one of the lots and proposed construction of a 16,000 square foot <br />building. The company hoped to close on one of the lots in August. She <br />further explained that the UCRA's goal in marketing this property was to <br />attract light manufacturing or employment-intensive warehouse uses which <br />needed the accessibility to I-170 and I-40. <br /> <br />The UCRA had, to date, rejected an offer to purchase property by a <br />self-storage company and a proposal for a series of retail storefronts <br />containing various automobile service and parts stores. <br /> <br />Mr. Rice asked if each lot was larger than an acre. Ms. Fahey responded <br />that each lot contained the minimum required 40,000 square feet and was, <br />therefore, not quite one acre in size. Mr. Rice moved that the Plan <br />Commission approve the UCRA's proposal to replat the "Olive/Skinker Business <br />Park Plat I" in accordance with the presented plan. Mr. Washington seconded <br />the motion which passed by a vote of 6-0. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION WITH SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS REGARDING <br />APPLICATION FOR LOCAL HISTORIC DESIGNATION OF UNIVERSITY CITY EDUCATION <br />DISTRICT <br /> <br />Chairman Hamilton stated that the Historic Preservation Commission's <br />Application for Designation of the University City Education District as a <br />Local Historic District had been tabled by the Plan Commission at its <br />regular May meeting. The Commission had invited the Superintendent and <br />Board Members of the University City School District to discuss the proposal <br />at this meeting. Chairman Hamilton noted that Commission members were in <br />receipt of Dr. Dodge's letter of June 4, 1986, stating the School District's <br />position on the issue. Mr. Goldman stated that the Commission was eager to <br />hear both sides of the issue. <br /> <br />Michael Kennedy arrived at 7:52 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairman Hamilton called on Mr. Bill Gantz, a member and former chairman of <br />the Historic Preservation Commission, to summarize the key points of the <br />Application. Mr. Gantz began by saying that the three buildings included in <br />the proposed Education District, Hanley Jr. High School, University City <br />High School and Jackson Park Elementary School, are already on the National <br />Register of Historic Places. His commission felt obliged to recognize its <br />historic significance and the consequent need to preserve the buildings <br />through local designation and the design review provided by the <br />Application's Landmark Standards. Mr. Gantz reviewed the historical and <br />architectural features of the buildings and explained the significance of <br />the "City Beautiful" design of the ensemble. He stated that although the <br />buildings were relatively new in historical terms, the Education District <br />had acquired a status of community significance that the Commission <br />recommended be preserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.