Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />March 25, 1992 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 7 <br /> <br />Mr. Foxworth asked whether an 8-10 foot fence would be high enough to stop basketballs from <br />going into the fenced-in area. Mr. King stated that he felt it would be sufficient unless the ball <br />was purposely thrown over the fence. <br /> <br />Mr. Marsh asked how much the facility would cost. Mr. King stated that the project would cost <br />approximately 1/2 million dollars. <br /> <br />Ms. Ratner asked what the main danger to a trespasser would be. Mr. King replied that the <br />only danger would be from climbing and falling off of the tower. This is not an electrical <br />tower, it is cellular. <br /> <br />Ms. Kreishman stated that she wants more landscaping. She further stated that she would like <br />to see the easement strip on the west side of the larger lot seeded until the property is further <br />developed. <br /> <br />Mr. Marsh stated that one of the Conditions should be that Southwestern Bell take the tower <br />down when it is no longer in use. <br /> <br />The Chairperson asked for comments from the public. No comments from the public were <br />made. The public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Mr. Kendall moved that the Plan Commission table the vote until the next meeting to allow the <br />applicant to provide further the following additional information: <br /> <br />1. A proposal for 8-10 foot fencing with razor wire. <br />2. A detailed landscaping plan, including less pavement on the parcel. <br />3. Whether or not the parcel can be enlarged. <br />4. Whether or not the parcel can be shifted further east, away from the park. <br />5. Whether the easement on the western part of the property can be seeded until further <br />development by the landowner. <br />6. Information should be provided concerning the need for this particular location. <br />7. Documentation should be provided concerning the affects on radio and TV reception to <br />area residents. <br /> <br />The motion was seconded by Ms. Ratner and passed by a vote of 5 - O. <br /> <br />PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 34-65.2. 65.3. 69.3. 110. 112.2. 112.4. <br />113.2. 118.1. 118.3. 118.4. 123.1 & 124.1. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kreishman informed those present that the Historic Preservation Commission has <br />submitted for Plan Commission and City Council approval, several Code Section Amendments <br />concerning the role of the Historic Preservation Commission (hereafter "HPC"). <br /> <br />m-3-25.plc <br /> <br />L <br />