My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-03-24
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
1993
>
1993-03-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2005 12:18:51 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:03:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
3/24/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />March 24, 1993 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4 <br /> <br />in mid-summer and would last only two weeks. No more comments were made by members <br />of the public and the public hearing portion of the proceedings was closed. <br /> <br />Mr. Marsh asked if the members of the Plan Commission had questions for either the staff or <br />the applicant. Ms. Kreishman asked if Cybertel envisioned this tower being operational ten <br />years from now. Mr. Shmitt replied that most likely it would be, and further, probably more <br />towers would be in use by then. Mr. Marsh asked if the applicant would object to a condition <br />that would require the tower to be removed if it were inoperative. Mr. Biesterfeld and Mr. <br />Shmitt replied that such a condition would be agreeable to Cybertel. Ms. Peniston asked what <br />color the tower would be painted. Mr. Shmitt replied that the tower would be painted a grayish- <br />blue to blend in with the sky. <br /> <br />Ms. Kreishman moved that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use <br />Permit, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. If the tower is taken out of service and remains out of operation for a period of three (3) <br />months or longer, all above-grade structures shall be taken down and removed from the <br />site. <br /> <br />2. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for his review <br />and approval. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the <br />approved plan. <br /> <br />The motion was seconded by Mr. Foxworth and passed by a vote of 6 - O. <br /> <br />Review of Development Plans of the 1986 Master Plan for the City of University City <br /> <br />Mr. Goldman reviewed the development plans in the 1986 Master Plan and gave an update on <br />each section. Many of the goals as stated in the plan have been reached or are outdated. It was <br />decided that the plan should be revised to reflect current trends and needs. Mr. Marsh asked <br />Mr. Goldman to draft an outline of the stafrs ideas of the development plans. <br /> <br />Adjournment <br /> <br />Mr. Safe moved that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was seconded by Ms. Kreishman <br />and carried by a vote of 6 - O. The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. <br /> <br />m-3-24.plc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.