Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />April 28, 1993 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3 <br /> <br />off-set that. <br /> <br />Mr. Safe stated that he had no difficulty with the application because it meets the minimum <br />requirements for lot sizes as set forth in the Zoning Code. Mr. Marsh moved that the Plan <br />Commission recommend that the City Council approve of the Final Plat. The motion died for <br />lack of a second. <br /> <br />Ms. Peniston stated that she opposed resubdivision because it produced a lot substantially smaller <br />than the rest of the lots in the neighborhood. Ms. Ratner stated that the lot was too small and <br />that the building line needed to be setback further. Ms. Kreishman stated that the proposal does <br />not meet the character of the neighborhood, that there was a potential grade change problem and <br />the lot size severely restricts the size of any structure to be built on the property. Mr. Foxworth <br />stated that he would be in favor of the proposal if the lots were equally subdivided. Mr. Kahn <br />stated that he was concerned with the front yard setback and feels it should meet the prevailing <br />pattern of the Teasdale Court side. <br /> <br />Ms. Kreishman moved that the Plan Commission recommend to the City Council that the <br />submitted final plat as presented tonight be denied; and in the alternative that the applicants <br />submit a revised preliminary plat andlor final plat for the next meeting. The motion was <br />seconded by Ms. Peniston and passed by a vote of 6 - 1. The applicant indicated that they <br />would resubmit a new proposal at the May Plan Commission meeting. <br /> <br />REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> <br />Mr. Goldman read a memo he had submitted before the meeting concerning an update to the <br />development plans of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Marsh stated that development <br />should be emphasized for the northeast residential area. Mr. Goldman stated that the residential <br />areas in the loop should also be emphasized. Ms. Ratner stated that she would be interested in <br />receiving updated 1990 census information. Mr. Goldman stated that could be provided as well <br />as a profile from the intern. <br /> <br />OTHER BUSINESS <br /> <br />Mr. Goldman and Mr. Hill updated the Commission on the progress of the Zoning Code <br />revisions. Ms. Schuman updated the Commission on several Council matters. She further asked <br />the opinion of the Commission on off-premise street signs for religious institutions. All <br />Commission members stated that they generally would not recommended such signs. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Mr. Foxworth moved that the Plan Commission meeting be adjourned. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Kahn and passed by a vote of 7 - O. <br /> <br />m-4-28.plc <br />