My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-04-27
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
1994
>
1994-04-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2005 4:42:01 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
4/27/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4-27-94 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 <br /> <br />Mr. William A. Thomas stated that he is representing Louis M. Aboussie in an attempt to <br />rezone the property at 7400 Olive from PA and GC to MR in order to convert the existing <br />school building to approximately 20 garden apartments and to construct approximately 20 two- <br />bedroom townhouses on an open area of the site. The building is the old Rabbinical College <br />site. <br /> <br />Chairperson Marsh called on Planning Director, Al Goldman to provide the staff report. Mr. <br />Goldman stated that the following comments are based on the information submitted by the <br />applicant prior in the week. However, new plans that address some of these concerns have been <br />brought to the meeting by the applicant. He has reviewed the revised plans for the proposed <br />multi-family development of the former St. Louis Rabbinic College property at 7400 Olive. The <br />drawings show a total of 57 apartment units, consisting of 4 studio apartments measuring about <br />450 square feet each, 16 townhouse apartments measuring about 900 square feet each and 37 <br />garden apartments ranging in size from 860 square feet to 1030 square feet. Although the <br />drawings are considerably improved from the earlier submittal, there are still substantial <br />weaknesses in the proposal. The major problems are as follows: <br /> <br />. Exterior windows. Except for the end units, the garden unit living rooms lack windows to <br />the exterior; the second bedroom in four of the townhouse apartments lacks windows; and the <br />studio apartment windows are obscured by the exterior stairs that provide access to the <br />townhouse units above. <br /> <br />. Building set-backs. Parking stalls and driveways are too close to apartment windows. <br />Twelve units have windows that open directly on a driveway and 14 units have windows that are <br />less than 10 feet from a drive or a parking area. The code requires at least 15 feet. <br /> <br />. Parking. The code requires 86 parking spaces for a project of this size. Only 81 spaces are <br />shown, including the 3 handicapped parking spaces (which are not really usable as shown). <br /> <br />. Commonly usable residential open space. The code calls for approximate 22,000 square <br />feet of commonly usable residential open space. Only about 17,000 square feet of such space <br />has been provided. <br /> <br />. Buffering. Single family development exists on three sides of the rear portion of the <br />property, yet the driveway, parking and outdoor activity areas abut these properties with little <br />or no buffering. <br /> <br />. Floor area ratio. According to my calculations the total gross floor area is 63,200 square <br />feet and the lot area is approximately 119,712 square feet (after the cemetery is deducted). Thus <br />the F.A.R. is .53, which exceeds the maximum permitted by the zoning code. <br /> <br />m-4-27.plc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.