1997-06-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

June 25, 1997 Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 Building code problems (not at issue here) might also prevent the construction of the porch enclosures. A preliminary discussion with the Deputy Building Commissioner revealed that a fire wall will most likely be required along the full length of the porch facing the garage on the adjacent property because the garages are located only 1' from the side property line. The proposed amendment contradicts the original intent of the planned subdivision by diminishing the already minimal open space in rear yards. He recommends that the application be denied. Chairperson Solodar opened the public hearing and asked for testimony from the public. Dr. Gene Rubin, 923 Barnard College stated that he lives next door to the Kirk’s and thinks that the addition of porches to the homes will be positive. The rear yards are private and separate. It may increase property values and will benefit the neighborhood as a whole. Gary Pedersen, 971 Morehouse Lane, stated that he is a trustee from the subdivision and is in favor of the rear porches. He feels the design is very good. Porches will allow people to enjoy their rear yards without the bother of mosquitoes. Fred Kirk, 959 Morehouse, stated that he supports the amendment. No other members of the public indicated a desire to speak, so the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed Ms. Glassman asked what was the reasoning open space requirements. Mr. Goldman stated that lack of open space impacts on the neighbors and creates of perception of crowding. Aesthetically, the rear yard creates green space and limits building coverage. Ms. Peniston stated that the addition of porches will preclude the planting of trees in that area. Carol Kirk stated that addition of the porches will increase the privacy between neighbors. Ms. Jackson asked what the comments were of the neighbors that voted against the proposal. Mr. Pedersen replied that there were no comments left by the negative voters. Mr. Price asked constructing a rear porch brings one closer to their neighbors. Mr. Goldman replied that it brings the building closer. Mr. Solodar asked what was being done to develop the common ground to the neighborhood. Mr. Pedersen replied that they are trying to construct a park-like setting with a path-way around the flooded area and some park benches. Dr. Rubin stated that University Place has more trees per square foot than any other subdivision in the city. Ms. Peniston stated that it is important keep open space and she will be voting against the proposal. Mr. Solodar stated that he agrees. The addition will make it too small for a play area for children. This may discourage people with children from locating there. m-6-25.plc