2000-03-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 22, 1999 Plan Commission Minutes Page 4 of 6 The motion was seconded by Mr. Self and passed by a vote of 7 to 0, with all members voting “aye.” Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit #354, Telecommunications Antenna, 8600 Delmar Chairperson Glassman announced that a public hearing was scheduled to hear an application from Omnipoint Communications C Operations, LLC, 12140 Woodcrest Executive Drive, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63141 represented by CIS Communications, LLC 165 N. Meramec, Suite 120, Clayton, MO 63105. The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit in order to erect telecommunications antennas at 8600 Delmar. The Chairperson noted the Commission's procedures and criteria for reviewing conditional use permits and amendments to them. The Chairperson specifically stated that the Plan Commission must consider whether the use: a) Complies with all applicable provisions of the University City Zoning Code; b) At the specific location will contribute to and promote the community welfare or convenience; c) Will not cause substantial injury to the value of neighboring property; d) Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood development plan (if applicable), and any other official planning and development policies of the City; and e) Will provide off-street parking and loading areas in accordance with the standards contained in Article 7 of the University City Zoning Code. Gary Crabtree and Peter Newton of CIS Communications, LLC appeared for the applicant. Mr. Crabtree gave an overview of the proposal. He asked that the application be approved. He also stated that the applicant agrees to the conditions as set forth in the staff recommendation. Mr. Hill gave the staff recommendation that the application be approved per his March 15, 2000 memo. Chairperson Glassman opened the public hearing and asked for testimony from the public. No members of the public indicated a desire to speak, so the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed. The Plan Commission determined that the evidence presented to the Plan Commission does support the conclusion that the proposed conditional use amendment: a) Complies with all applicable provisions of the University City Zoning Code; b) At the specific location will contribute to and promote the community welfare or convenience; c) Will not cause substantial injury to the value of neighboring property; d) Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood development plan (if applicable), and any other official planning and development policies of the City; and e) Will provide off-street parking and loading areas in accordance with the standards contained in Article 7 of the University City Zoning Code. Further, the Plan K:\WPOFFICE\WPDATA\m-3-22-2000.plc.wpd