My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-09-28
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
2005-09-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2005 11:50:53 AM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:04:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
9/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
September 28, 2005 Plan Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 <br />application and asked that it be approved. Mr. Hill gave an overview of the proposed text amendment <br />and asked that it be approved per the Staff Report. <br />Ms. Borg stated that she was inclined to leave the ordinance as it is. Ms. Ricci asked the applicant why <br />they wanted to change the ordinance when they could go in as a legal non-conforming use. Mr. <br />Blackwell replied that the University wanted to have a legal conforming use so that they would not be <br />limited by the current non-conforming status. <br />The Chairperson asked for comments from the members of the public. John Solodar, 8135 Cornell <br />Court stated that if the University wished to expand the use in the future they could file for a variance <br />before the Board of Adjustment. No other members of the public wished to speak. <br />Mr. Marentette stated that he would vote for the amendment because it is a minor change in the law <br />that affects nobody. Mr. Smith stated that all the amendment will change is that a new school could <br />start on a lot with a minimum 2.5 acres instead of 3. <br />bolded <br />Mr. Smith moved that the proposed text amendment be approved as follows (additions are and <br />deletions are stricken through): <br />12. Schools, private; including college or university-level facilities, provided that such <br />two and one half <br />buildings are located upon sites containing three or more acres. <br />The motion was seconded by Mr. Marentette and passed by a vote of 3 to 2 with Mr. Smith, Mr. <br />Marentette and Ms. Arbogast voting “aye” and Ms. Ricci and Ms. Borg voting ‘nay.” <br />Discussion of Cell Tower Task Force Reports <br />The Chairperson announced that the Commission would consider a new version of the proposed Cell <br />Phone Tower ordinance as submitted by Mr. Wagner. Mr. Wagner explained that the two factions of <br />the Cell Phone Tower Task Force have come together and resubmitted this latest version with which <br />they are all in agreement. <br />Mr. Smith stated that he wanted a blackline version of the proposed ordinance showing the current and <br />proposed text and that the city attorney should give a full review of the ordinance. <br />Adjournment <br />The electricity went out in the building due to weather. Ms. Arbogast moved for adjournment. The <br />motion was seconded by Mr. Marentette and passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. <br />K:\WPOFFICE\WPDATA\m-9-28-2005.plc.final.wpd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.