My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-01-04
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-01-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2006 4:02:15 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:04:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />\ <br />\- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />residents and the developer to try to come to some agreement before asking for a review, preventing <br />frivolous disputes and threatened lawsuits. Using the IRB is not mandatory, it is not required, it can <br />only review and make a recommendation; it is a tool to help the residents and developer settle <br />disputes in an amicable way. <br /> <br />Municipalities throughout the country, other than those that have no building codes or zoning codes, <br />are dealing with this serious issue of preservation vs. unbridled development. U City is not alone in <br />addressing the issue. I believe the IRB Ordinance is the right way to begin to address the problem. <br /> <br />I believe that the establishment of an In-fill Review Board will be an asset and enhancement to the <br />orderly development ofU City in the future and is what the citizens want. I think we make a serious <br />mistake by continuing to ignore this need. <br /> <br />Rosalyn Borg <br />7820 Cornell <br />8t. Louis, MO 63130 <br />3 14- 721- 7441 <br />rosalynborg@juno.com <br /> <br />1/6/' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.