Laserfiche WebLink
curbs with “S” curbs that allows cars to park on them and it could gain as much as 8 inches on each <br />side (16” in total) and giving plenty of room for the trash trucks. He mentioned that he has seen <br />trash trucks having rough times maneuvering on the street but they made it. He would also like to <br />see the statistics of the Fire Department regarding how many times a year the fire trucks uses the <br />street. He understands that the room is tight for the fire trucks but they made it. <br /> <br />Restricting parking just inconveniences everybody and could evolve to a bigger issue that could end <br />in them having a private street (regarding parking) and they don’t want that. He concludes that the <br />City should look at the portion of the street where “S” curbs can be installed and in the meantime, the <br />Police should ticket cars that restrict the travel of emergency vehicles. He stated that if the trash <br />truck drivers made it, the special school bus driver should be able to make it as well. <br /> <br />A representative of the 7100 block also in opposition stated that only one side of the street would not <br />allow enough room for all of the current vehicles to park on Northmoor. An alternative could be to <br />implement “no parking” at narrower areas. She stated that the width of a fire truck should be <br />between 7½ -8 feet and the width of regular cars is about 6 feet. Considering that cars should not <br />park more than 6inches away from the curb, an emergency vehicle can fit on the road but cannot <br />maneuver as much as in the areas wider than 24 feet. Ms. Tapia, Public Works representative, <br />stated that the standards are eight feet for parking and 11 feet for travel lanes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Patterson recommended that the City identify the portions of the street that parking <br />should be restricted on one side and exempt the areas where the street is wider. <br /> <br />Ms. Tapia mentioned that another alternative is the implementation of the residential parking permit <br />system that would reduce the volume of cars parked on the street (no Washington University <br />students, no metro users, etc). <br /> <br />Commissioner Paterson stated that a combination of partial parking restrictions and residential <br />parking could work. <br /> <br />It was discussed among the residents that it’s the City’s responsibility to keep people safe. But also, <br />there was a concern when parking is only allowed on one side of street, the street seems wider and <br />this allows for drivers to speed and increase the possibility of using the street as a cut thru. <br />Commissioner Paterson stated that parking should not be used to control speeding problems but the <br />Police should enforce the law. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brot stated that the residential parking system is a good solution to limit non-residents <br />from parking on the street. Considering the amount of people with driveways, the firefighters <br />concerns and the possibility of people parking over on the sidewalks, she hopes that this time the <br />City could made some change to protect the lives of the people that live there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Patterson asked if the implementation of the “S” curbs is a possibility. Ms. Tapia <br />stated that at this time it is cost prohibitive. Resident stated that the implementation of “S” curbs is <br />the solution but it’s dismissed immediately by the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Tapia stated that the cost for concrete curbing is about $45 per linear foot, just labor and <br />materials. She also explained that none of the traffic issues are based on popularity demands but in <br />traffic warrants. We include the residents affected because it’s one of the parameters to consider. <br /> <br />The residents say that the solution for emergency vehicles to travel on the street should be burdened <br />by the City and not by the residents. <br /> <br />Minutes – November 12, 2008 Page <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />