Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1241, Minutes. Page 4 <br />March 24,; 19a0 <br />negotiated by the city attorney and himself. He said all four remaining companies <br />(Telcom, American, Continental and Gateway) have the capability of providing qual- <br />ity service. He thought the proposals provided the Council with an objective look <br />at what the companies have already done,.and_a subjective look -as to .what their <br />future. capabilities seem to be. <br />Mayor Mooney said he also felt it was time for a decision, as the Council has been <br />going to many meetings and studying this matter over a period of about eight months. <br />Councilman Glickert had some additional questions, which had to do with location of <br />major and access studios, what was.the shortest term of a franchise held by any of <br />the companies, and exactly what is covered in the home security package. All pro- <br />posals included home security except Continental, which said it would offer a sys- <br />tem if Council wants it, or lease channel space to existing security systems here. <br />Councilman Kelley asked Continental if they are planning to give 5% of their total <br />gross revenue to University City, instead of 5% of the basic monthly service fee <br />(if approved by'FCC), and their representative, Mr. Wand, said that was correct. <br />Councilman Kelley questioned the representatives about channel capacity of the var- <br />ious systems. At present all have 35 channels. Continental said their capacity <br />would be 60 channels, Telcom 52 (which their representative, Mr. Brooks, said was <br />the optimum), American 40, expandable to 52, and Mr. Warner of Gateway said all <br />companies have the same capability for expansion. <br />Councilman Kelley asked what the average use of the public access service is in <br />the franchises that each currently has, and what is the maximum hourly use per <br />week of the public access service.. Varying answers were given, and each repre- <br />sentative indicated that much depends on the community and how involved the people <br />wish to become. All said they promote use of the public access channel vigorously. <br />Gateway said they'had already hired someone for local program assistance, as has <br />Telcom, and the others said people would be hired immediately after granting of <br />the franchise. <br />In answer to questions from Councilman Glickert, all indicated that the installa- <br />tion charge would be waived for at least 30 days, and all said there is no charge <br />for installation of extra services, if they are included at the time of original <br />installation. If the company must return, there are additional charges, ranging <br />from $10 for Gateway and Telcom-to $14.95 for American and Continental. <br />Councilman Adams asked several questions about convertors. Mr—Adams said he felt <br />that none of the companies had enough equipment for local origination programs. <br />All representatives said there would be additional expenditures in this area as <br />the usage increases, but it. is usually low in the.beginning.. <br />Councilman Kelley questioned the representatives about financing costs for con- <br />struction of the system, and what percentage of funds will be from debt and what <br />percentage will be from equity. Telcom and American said theirs would be a 60-40 <br />ratio, Continental was not sure, and Gateway said their funds would be from in- <br />ternally generated cash flow, no debt. All said their rates were fixed for at <br />least two years; Gateway guaranteed theirs for three years. <br />Councilman Glickert asked if they would consent to a periodic review clause, and <br />all said they would. They also answered questions she had about what their <br />