2011-06-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

minimize impacts. Staff may add conditions that are not typical, but appropriate depending on the use. Mr. Halpert asked Mr. Jennings if vehicles will be stored outdoors overnight. Mr. Jennings stated they are typically not. Most jobs take about 2 hours. Vehicles are stored inside. Mr. Senturia made a motion to approve Conditional Use Permit application P100031 with the conditions set forth by staff in Staff Report Attachment A. Ms. Greening seconded the motion. The motion passed. Public Hearing: Two Conditional Use Permit Applications – 8390 Delmar Boulevard The Chairperson announced that a public hearing was scheduled for two Conditional Use Permit applications at 8390 Delmar Boulevard, application P100034 to allow for a new retail building with drive-through facilities and application P100035 to allow for a new office building that exceeds the maximum building height allowed. Both Conditional Use Permit applications would be discussed together since they are on the same site. Staff provided an overview of maps and pictures of the site. The applicant, Kent Evans with Delmar, LLC, provided an overview of the proposed development. The proposed development includes a new Walgreens store with a drive-through and a new office building. Current tenants in the existing office building would relocate to the new office building. The applicant also noted the proposed landscape easement on the east side of the subject site. The applicant also stated that in addition to the new buildings, the proposal includes the following improvements; a new traffic signal, cross walks, and right-of-way acquisition, which are all currently being evaluated by a traffic study. Mr. Evans asked questions about the staff report. Regarding the drive-through, he would prefer the option for 24-hour operation. He stated he spoke with neighbors and they are in favor of a 24-hour operation. Mr. Evans also asked about the fence requirement. He stated that based on the nature of the site, there are many options for pedestrian access and would like consideration to not require the fence. Mr. Evans also asked about the meaning of “substantial change” in condition 9A. Chi Feng with Aedis Architects, project architect, asked a question about the staff report condition pertaining to the sign.He asked if more flexibility for the monument type sign could be considered. Keith Steiner with Aedis Architects asked about the Zoning Code requirements for signs vs. conditions in the staff report which sets the maximum height of the sign at six feet. Mr. Steiner asked if the measurement includes the base of the sign or just the face. Mr. Halpert stated that staff will address those comments later in the staff report. Mr. Steiner asked if the site sign will be separate from each building’s signage. He stated that Walgreens usually prefers their own signage. tm; E