My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-11-02
Public Access
>
Weekly Updates
>
2006-11-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2006 4:28:18 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:28:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor Adams and City Council <br /> <br />From: Julie Feier, City Manager <br /> <br />Date: November 2, 2006 <br /> <br />Subject: Weekly Update <br /> <br /> <br />Parliamentarian Dorris Carter will provide a session on conducting efficient <br />Parliamentarian procedures <br />meetings and field questions on . All interested <br />Board and Commission Members are welcome, as well as residents who serve <br />on private boards. The session will be from 6:30 pm to 8:00 pm at Centennial <br />Commons Century Room1 on November 15. <br /> <br />The Missouri Supreme Court denied the motion to modify and motion for <br />rehearing that AT&T (formerly SBC) filed in the cities’ lawsuit over AT&T's failure <br />to pay telephone business license taxes on long-distance landline service and <br />local landline gross receipts <br />certain items of . However, on the Court's own <br />motion the August 8, 2006 opinion was modified to state that the cities <br />are seeking to enforce the application of their license tax to long-distance <br />service; the Court deleted previous references to wireless service. The Court did <br />not change the August 8, 2006 opinions in the wireless service cases. The Court <br />simply corrected its mistaken description of the AT&T (formerly SBC) lawsuit as <br />being a wireless lawsuit, the case, which was remanded to St. Louis City Circuit <br />Court for further proceedings. <br /> <br />AT&T informed the Missouri Municipal League that they would release gross <br />receipt taxes owed to cities for July, August, & September. Since HB 209 <br />changed the rates July 1 but was then thrown out by the Missouri Supreme <br />Court, the taxes paid will be based on the previous tax rate in effect as of June <br />2006. The League believes that more and more cell phone companies are <br />adding the gross receipts taxes to phone bills. Sprint has done this. I have <br />received multiple contacts from residents, questioning the fee increase. Because <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.