My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-11-02
Public Access
>
Weekly Updates
>
2006-11-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2006 4:28:18 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:28:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
some cell companies continue to contest the law, we do not know what they will <br />do with the tax they collect. The City has not received any revenue (9% utility <br />tax) from the cell phone companies to date. <br /> <br />Some legislators have told local officials that the telephone industry is drafting a <br />new bill to replace HB 209 and some legislators have indicated that they will try <br />to enact it into law. This subsequent bill to 209 will likely be similar to HB 209 <br />(apply the GR tax to cell phones but force a rollback of the rate, but go back to <br />the more city favorable formula known as the Griesheimer compromise). It will <br />probably try to address the back tax litigation somehow. Presumably, the <br />industry will try to fix the problem that caused the law to be thrown out. <br /> <br />AT&T wants to deliver video <br />Related but separate, service to our residents. <br />AT&T has been negotiating with a municipal consortium coordinated through the <br />MML with attorneys Ken Heinz and Paul Martin. They are offering the same <br />franchise agreements to all municipalities in order to operate within their <br />boundaries. However, the delivery system is different. AT&T will require repeater <br />boxes in the public rights-of-way, I attached a presentation from a recent Illinois <br />Municipal League conference which shows the repeater boxes. The presentation <br />can be found on-line at http://www.iml.org/spps/ahpg.cfm?spgid=43, titled, <br /> <br />“AT&T's Project Lightspeed: It's a Duck”. <br /> <br />A group of University City residents is holding a public meeting to discuss <br />opportunities surrounding U.City’s oldest home, the Sutter-Meyer House on <br />th <br />Thursday, November 9, at the Pershing School Library, 6761 Bartmer, at 7 pm. <br />Since the Council has not decided what the future will be for this city-owned <br />former farmhouse, a citizen group is working together to research the possibilities <br />for the home, which is on the National Register of Historic Places and was <br />designated a city historic landmark in 1986. The citizen committee, calling <br />Sutter-MeyerSociety <br />themselves the will develop ideas and make <br />recommendation to the Historic Preservation Commission and to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Green Center, a natural laboratory & Cultural gathering place, <br />The has <br />already raised $48,000 to build a greenhouse onsite in Kaufman Park to enhance <br />their educational opportunities. They need to raise an additional $50,000 before <br />they can begin construction. The capital campaign to complete the project is in <br />full swing, if you have any questions contact, Matt Hoyne at 725-8314. <br /> <br />Olive <br />There has been some conversation about expediting the construction at <br />and I-170 <br /> to avoid multiple closures during the Hwy. 40 construction. I will meet <br />with representatives of MODOT and Olivette next week to discuss the pros and <br />cons of speeding up project completion. While it definitely would make sense <br />regionally to complete the project ahead of schedule, there will undoubtedly be <br />impact to our business owners if the proposal includes prolonged closures. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.