Laserfiche WebLink
Session 170 I, Minutes <br />July 7, 1997 <br /> <br />are putting in another nursing home. The certificate of need for this project has not been approved yet at the State level. <br />They are asking to build another nursing home based on it being used for the Jewish population. Mr. Feldman asked Council <br />not to approve the site plan when it comes to them for approval, until Mr. Deutsch agrees to furnish some Medicaid beds <br />for poor people. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams said that Mr. Deutsch had already brought his site plan before Council and that it had been approved. Mr. <br />Feldman said that he attempted to get to Council before Mr. Deutsch, but he was sorry he was too late to do anything. <br /> <br />Mr. Jaimeson Fredericks, 7300 Westmoreland, asked that Council keep the parks safe, so she and her friends could play. <br /> <br />Mr. Maurice IG~rzin, 814 Pennsylvania, thought Council should know that he was persuaded by one of the City's department <br />heads not to come tonight to air his complaint. Down the street from him, his neighbors have a driveway on one side, but <br />they also tried to construct another driveway on the other side. They had taken a conglomeration of concrete materials and <br />used it to come across the curb and the treeline, across two slabs of the sidewalk and went to a vacant lot which runs up <br />against their building. A couple of months ago, Mr. Karzin contacted the Public Works department and complained to Mr. <br />Paul Hayes. One month later he caught up with Mr. Hayes, and he said he knew nothing about it, but that he would go by <br />and take care of it. This was two months ago. Another month went by, so he contacted Mr. Hayes again. He told Mr. <br />Karzin that it wasn't his department and proceeded to give him Frank Hill's phone number and transferred him. Mr. Hill told <br />Mr. Karzin that he would have to see Mr. Paul Hayes. Mr. Karzin told the Council that this has been going on for three <br />months and three weeks. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams assured Mr. Karzin it would stop tonight and that City Manager Ollendorffwould get on it first thing' in the <br />morning. Mr. Schoomer asked Mr. Karzin if he was the one who had called him about this problem about four or live <br />weeks ago. Mr. Karzin said that he was. Mr. Schoomer said that he was sure he had referred the problem to Mr, <br />Ollendorff. He asked Mr. Ollendorffto let him know what happens. <br /> <br />Mrs. Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel, asked to speak about the Heman Park Swimming Pool. She would like to see it become <br />more user friendly. Each evening at five, over a hundred people have to leave the pool because of a policy to close the pool <br />between 5:00 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. No other swimming pool in St. Louis closes their pool like this. She believes it is an <br />unnecessary closing time. The City has invested a million dollars in the Heman Park swimming pool. Thirty minutes a day <br />translates into seven summer afternoons of swim time. The swimming season is fourteen weeks. The time permitted to <br />swim is from noon until five p.m. The pool then reopens at 5:30 p.m. and then people swim until 7:30 p.m. or so. She <br />does not understand the logic behind this closing time. She wants to know why this policy continues. Twelve years ago, <br />perhaps it was necessary, but it is not necessary today. She is asking Council to waive this policy this evening. Then in <br />October, when the Park Commission considers all the different dues pertaining to the swimming pool, they will have <br />something to compare. Council has the authority to change it. <br /> <br />Mrs. Thompson, addressing the City Manager, asked what the procedure would be to waive this policy, because only a half <br />an hour is being talked about here. Some people come to the pool and have to get out right away to wait the thirty <br />minutes. Some people do not come back or participate again in the afternoon session. She also asked why the policy was <br />instituted in the first place. Mr. Ollendorff replied that he would get with the Park staff and commission and investigate the <br />reasons behind the policy. These policies were adopted ten to eleven years ago and Mrs. Glickert has been opposed to <br />them ever since. Mr. Ollendorffdoes not recall all the reasons for it. He believes it was for control of entry and use of the <br />pool, since the evenings were for family swims and the daytime was not. He recommends against any hasty change. Mrs. <br />Thompson said that if it has been this way for ten years, maybe the City Manager needs to relook at it, because it is possibly <br />outdated. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner stated that Mrs. Glickert should take her suggestion to the next Park Commission meeting. That group has <br />time to deal with these types of issues. Mrs. Glickert responded that this policy can easily be changed by the City Council, <br />tonight. Mr. Wagner, again, urged Mrs. Glickert to bring her case to the next Park Commission meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />