Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Andrew Wool, 731 Oakbrook Lane <br />Mr. Wool stated he was against the project in theory and practice. He said in theory it was a <br />joke, a hundred million dollars for a tourist attraction. Mr. Wool said the extra taxes paid in <br />the Loop were unconstitutional and the grant was fraudulent under the Alternation Energy <br />and Transportation Act. He noted that the City has school closings in Mr. Price’s ward, crime <br />is up, dysfunction on the Council, police and fire departments fighting, 200 kids coming in and <br />causing trouble, streets and parks departments combined making lesser of both departments, <br />these are real problems. Mr. Wool said it would not work and was an incredulous frivolous <br />plan. He stated that Delmar is already a busy street, with already parking problems, already <br />traffic, and already pedestrian overload on the weekend but the two ton trolley would not <br />affect anything? He said the Council does have the power to stop it. <br /> <br />Pat Forster, 7438 Stratford <br />Ms. Forster stated that the trolley is a duplication of two existing Metro transportation services <br />in the Loop already, Bus #97 and the Metro Connector Loop Bus. The majority of the trolley <br />riders will be tourists. She said the Loop merchants are funding this project as the City of St. <br />Louis’ east end of the trolley route is vacant. Ms. Forster noted U City Loop already has the <br />tourist and felt it a waste of taxpayer money. <br /> <br />Ms. Christine Michel, 736 Eastgate <br />Ms. Michel asked why a trolley and not a double-decker bus. She could not envision how the <br />trolley would fit in the present space. Ms. Michel asked if there would be extra cross-walks <br />and street lights. She was also concerned about the effect of the construction on Delmar. <br />Ms. Michel asked where people would park. <br /> <br />Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel <br />Ms. Glickert asked for the feasibility study for the $250,000 that University City spent. She <br />asked why a double track at Mehlville as this was a bicycle path and asked why not at <br />Eastgate. Ms. Glickert would like to know why it does not follow the streetcar from years ago <br />by turning on Limit and go around the loop. She noted that this is how the Loop got its name. <br />Ms. Glickert noted that original rider projection was one hundred million and tonight it was <br />three hundred thousand. She asked that the trolley project be a single track through <br />University City Loop area. <br /> <br />Linda Locke, 6925 Cornell <br />Ms. Locke asked about the timing of the Parkview Gardens Plan and the Loop Trolley and its <br />impact on parking. She said she lives in an adjacent neighborhood and questioned what <br />would be the impact to these streets. Secondly she said the economic benefits are <br />disproportionately settled into development that takes place along Delmar & DeBaliviere, yet <br />a significant portion of the funding was coming from the University City’s Loop’s retail sales <br />tax. Ms. Locke asked what was to become of Epstein Plaza and the Rainman Statue. <br /> <br />Greg Pace, 7171 Westmoreland <br />Mr. Pace stated he is in favor of the trolley project. He said the trolley is about extending the <br />Loop which is a tourist/convention attraction. Mr. Pace stated there will be a lot of benefit for <br />the area: jobs, business opportunities, etc. He said the double track makes sense to <br />Kingsland. Mr. Pace said what goes up, comes down a lot faster and would not take much to <br />return to the original if the project failed. <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br />