05/08/95 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1640, Minutes Page 6 May 8, 1995 Mrs. Schuman moved to reopen this item for discussion. Mr. Wagner seoonded the motion. Councilmembers Cotton, Wagner, Schuman, and Thompson voted Aye, and Mayor Majerus and Counc-~lme'mb~l.- Sc~ voted Nay. it w~uld .~eed. Sinoe the applicant stated the project would be viable only with a 15 foot deck, she thought a differenoe of five feet should not Mr. Ollendorff said if a motion to approve is made, all conditi~ should be in~ludsi, plus a condition requiring that the build~ng's grease trap be put on the owner's property rather than on the south side of ~ South. Mr. Schocmer felt the change from a 10 to a 15 foot deck was substantial, was not in accord with the District's development plan, and should be reviewed by the Loop Special Business District O~ion. He moved to ~ble pending an Mr. Cottc~ and Mr. Wagner both felt this was an exoellent plan deserving of support. Mayor Majerus suggested adding a oomiition regard/rig the owner's offer to set aside parking in his private lot for this project. Owner Pay Ghasedi said there were 22 s~aoes that building tenants may use. However, if the grease container is moved to the parking lot, at least one space will be lost; also, overhead wirin~ interferes with emptying the trap. Several councilmembers agreed the grease trap was inappropriate in its present location and moving it should be a condition. Mayor Majerus suggested that if compliance is im- possible, the owner can return to Council. Mr. Ollendorff noted there were eight other businesses in the Loop that have grease traps, and perhaps c~e of Mrs. Sc~ moved approval of a 15 foot deck with all conditions previously attac~ed, and including grease trap removal fz-~t~ the south side of Loop South. Mr. Wagner seco~. Mr. Schocmer felt this will be a substantial overuse of the site, affecting bus/nesses and future devel~t in the area, and that those most affeoted by the proposal should be given a chance to review it. All voted Aye e.~oept Mayor Majerus and Councilmember Schocmer, who voted Nay. RTT,T.q I~:)R SR(::X:)ND, AND T'B-r'RD BILL NO. 8225 - ~ING ~ 34 ~3NICIPAL COW BY C~%NGING THE ClASSIFI- CATION OF C~ P~OPERTY AT OR NEAR 1000 PENNSYLVANIA F~C~4 "PRO" PIANNED RESIDENTIAL-OFFICE TO "GC" GENERAL (X~4~%CIAL, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 34-9 OF THE UNIVERSIT~ CITY ZONING CODE. Oonsideration of Bill No. 8225 was post~. BILL NO. 8227 - AMenDING ~ 34 ~3NICIPAL CO~E R~ATING TO ZONING BY RE- I:~'r,TNG S~L'~fION 34-36.4 Rk~ATING TO (IkNDITIONAL USES IN THE "RE" RSTAIL (IX4- MERCIAL DISTRICT, AND ENACTING IN ~ THERBOF A NEW SECTION TO ~E KNOWN AS