Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />5. <br />Sidewalk and curb replacement project to be awarded to SBC Contracting, Inc. for $87,825.00. <br />The staff recommended approval of the award for sidewalk and curb replacement project to be <br />awarded to SBC Contracting, Inc. for $87,825.00. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe moved to approve the award for the sidewalk and curb replacement project to SBC <br />Contracting, Inc. for $87,825.00 and was seconded by Mr. Price. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow asked if SBC Contracting, Inc. have been involved in any previous sidewalk and curb <br />replacement. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson stated he would have to check, but staff engineers recommended SBC Contracting, <br />Inc. because they had used them in the past. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow asked if this firm was one of the firms that had caused his telephone to ring <br />excessively about the concrete not matching and work being of poor quality. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson said no. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow noted the wide spread of bids and wanted to know if the spread raised any concerns. <br />He said he cringed at the fact of getting more calls from residents about the concrete not <br />matching or their grass was damaged. Mr. Crow also asked if they would be in his area. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson said they would be working in the north area of U City. He said the City was <br />obligated to go with the low bid unless the contractor was on their black list. He noted the <br />issue with the concrete not matching should not happen again. He said that at the time they <br />were trying to cut costs and realized it was not worth the effort. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert asked where the work would take place. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson said he would provide that information to Mr. Walker to distribute to Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe’s motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />L. COUNCIL REPORTS/BUSINESS <br />1. Boards and Commissions Appointments Needed <br /> Mayor Welsch mentioned the appointments that were outstanding. <br /> <br />2. Council Liaison Reports on Boards and Commissions <br /> None <br /> <br />3. Boards, Commissions and Task Force Minutes <br /> Council received copies of the Board and Commission minutes in their packets. <br /> <br />4. Other Discussions/Business <br /> <br /> Parkview Gardens Plan discussion requested by Ms. Carr and Mr. Crow. <br />Ms. Carr mentioned that there was a presentation regarding the Parkview Garden Plan at <br />the last study session meeting given by Dr. John Hoal with H3 Studio. She noted that H3 <br />Studio has a no-competition contract. Ms. Carr said that Mr. Hoal mentioned that the staff <br />was instrumental in putting together the stakeholder’s list. She was puzzled regarding the <br />stakeholder’s list because three of the property owners whose property abutted parking lot <br />#4 were not identified as stakeholders but a developer, Mr. Bruce Mills, was named as a <br />stakeholder. Ms. Carr stated in her research she found that Mr. Hoal had developed a <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />