Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tenant. He stated that these two modifications, in s <br />significant changes, and that the Final Development Plan was in substantial compliance with the <br />approved Preliminary Development Plan. Mr. Greatens stated that revised comments from the <br />Department of Public Works and Parks, which recommended conditional approval of the <br />Improvement Plans submitted and that Staff recommended approval of the Final Development <br />Plan conditional upon obtaining full approval of the Improvement Plans from the Department of <br />Public Works and Parks. <br /> <br />Mr. Greatens explained that the Final Development Plan process included a recommendation <br />from the Plan Commission which would be forwarded to City Council. He stated that the <br />Preliminary Development Plan was approved by City Council in September, which then <br />authorized the submittal of the Final Development Plan. This also required submittal of the <br />Improvement Plans which were submitted and granted conditional approval from the Department <br />of Public Works and Parks. <br /> <br />Questions/Comments from Plan Commission members and responses included: <br /> <br /> <br />Question: What will be the next step in the process? Mr. Greatens: The proposal would <br />go before City Council for approval by ordinance which requires two meetings. <br /> <br /> <br />Question: Was the Department of Public Works and Parks the source of the two <br />suggested modifications to the Final Development Plan? Mr. Greatens: No, the <br />modifications came about through revisions in the final design process. <br /> <br /> <br />Question: What were the changes requested by Department of Public Works and Parks? <br />Mr. Greatens: They provided technical comments regarding the Improvement Plans <br />which they had been coordinating with the applicant on in order to grant the final <br />conditional approval. Mr. Greatens deferred to Mr. Tao to elaborate further on the <br />proposed changes. <br /> <br /> <br />Question: The Plan Commission has been asked to review the Final Development Plan <br />with the understanding that the questions posed by the Department of Public Works and <br />Parks would eventually be addressed? Staff: Correct. These items will be addressed <br />prior to submittal of the Final Development Plan to City Council. <br /> <br /> <br />Would you characterize any of the proposed questions by Public Works Department as <br />substantial issues or are they relatively minor? Mr. Tao: No, they are all accounted for <br />and would not prevent the project from proceeding under the current format. <br /> <br />Mr. Greatens read a written comment from the director of Public Works and Parks Department <br />dated November 28, 2012 which stated that the plans were conditionally approved pending the <br />submittal and final approval of comments made Enright <br /> <br /> <br />tm; šE <br /> <br /> <br />