My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-06-24 Reg
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-06-24 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2013 9:17:45 AM
Creation date
7/18/2013 9:17:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
6/24/2013
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />citizens. He stated if Wash U wants to put in $400,000 to a C.I.D. and they are the <br />land owners, they would have the largest vote in the deal. Mr. Crow asked why the <br />City was being asked to pay for it. <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti noted the $40,000 was approved last year by the Economic <br />Development Retail Sales Tax Board, as well as City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow said so because money from the Economic Retail Sales Tax it was set <br />aside, the Council would have to approve the contract. <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti said her statement was the budget was approved last year. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow noted he has a question of the benefit to the City, as to the benefit to one <br />of the landowners. <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti noted that one of the work products the City asked for the attorney to <br />prepare was an educational component as to what the benefits were of the <br />Community Improvement District and its significant outreach of public involvement. <br />She stated that part of it could be what the benefits were to the community and the <br />City in forming a C.I.D. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert asked Ms. Riganti if she knew what Skinker/DeBaliviere Council would <br />be appropriating to the contract with Armstrong Teasdale. Ms. Riganti said their <br />share was of equal amount, $40,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Kraft noted the Council was voting to have an attorney tell Council about a <br />formation of a C.I.D. and Council could vote it down if it was not liked. Mr. Kraft said <br />he would not mind paying for an attorney but would not want to pay the attorney he <br />would be negotiating with later. He asked if the Loop Special Business District had <br />their own funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti stated they did, collecting around $70,000 a year. She said the Loop <br />SBD did request funds from the Economic Retail Sales Tax in the City for the legal <br />services. Ms. Riganti noted the attorney will be engaged by U-City and also by <br />Skinker/DeBaliviere Neighborhood Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Kraft asked if the attorney being hired was the City’s attorney. Ms. Riganti agreed <br />that would be the case. He said the ambivalence he hears is that the City would pick <br />up the whole tab <br /> <br />Mr. Walker stated by hearing some of the questions and concerns, he will withdraw <br />this item and have farther discussion with staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert said it would need a motion to postpone. Mr. Glickert said the motion <br />before Council is to postpone discussion of entering into a contract with Armstrong <br />Teasdale, until staff has further time to study and bring back to Council. The motion <br />was seconded by Mr. Kraft. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.