Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Crow said even going to the Loop Special Business District; to him the question <br />would it benefit the Loop Special Business District owners of the businesses or the <br />land owners. He noted the land owners and business owners should be brought into <br />this conversation going forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Price asked for clarification of the motion if it was to bring back information for <br />Council to review in advance versus trying to decide from information Council <br />receives that day. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch noted the back-up documents for this agenda item were provided in <br />Council’s packet, so Council had received material prior to the day of the meeting. <br />Mayor Welsch stated the motion was to postpone consideration of this item until staff <br />had time to review it and make recommendation to Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Price said when you surrender or give away your business district you lose <br />control. He wanted to know what the benefits to U-City were. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe asked Mr. Walker to have the City Attorney to look at this and let Council <br />know if it was in the best interest of the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch reminded Council if they have any questions about any of the agenda <br />items, to please contact Mr. Walker or whoever put the item on the agenda in <br />advance of the event, so information could be provided to Council before the night <br />when Council is asked to vote on it. <br /> <br />Mr. Kraft called for a Point of Order stating that Council needed to vote on <br />postponing vote on this agenda item. <br /> <br />The voice vote for those in favor of postponing discussion on entering into the legal <br />contract and carried unanimously. <br /> <br />6. <br />Approval of the Police Department Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant <br />(JAG) Program application for license plate reader system for $18,870.00, with no <br />matching funds required. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert moved to approve, was seconded by Mr. Sharpe and the motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />7. <br />Information report on budget update that includes information on projected revenues <br />and expenditures as well as the reserve information. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr asked if what they were reviewing was the projected not the actual. She <br />asked what the difference was between the projected and the amended. <br /> <br />Finance Director Tina Charumilind stated the amended budget is the budget and the <br />projected budget is the actual. She stated when budget is first adopted for FY13 <br />there were two amendments submitted to City Council for approval and those <br />approvals changed the budget to the amended budget. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />